explaining in a New York Times profile that he made the show to explore how homophobia and racism allowed Dahmer’s murders to continue

Wait, did he say “just” an LGBTQ story?

Not to mention it’s literally a true story. When do we just start deciding to change history to appease people?

Harry’s having a James Franco moment. He’s been playing along with an undisclosed orientation until he started dating a woman. Now he appears to be just another straight guy trying to look edgy. Denying that he’s actually in a relationship is just odd.

And he really shouldn’t try to speak about LGBTQ history of sodomy…

‘and my understanding of his personal life and sexuality went no deeper than “I understand he’s bi.” ’

To give you a bit more of an understanding- Harry hasn’t come out as bi, and has made a point of not labeling his sexuality saying he feels labels are outdated and he doesn’t want to share this information with the…

I think this is a needlessly mean-spirited take on his quote.

oh I’m fine if he wants to paint his nails etc even if he’s straight, I think it’s just a double standard that when queer people do it they often face discrimination for it. It’s a complicated topic, that I don’t think there’s necessarily a right or wrong way to feel about it. but dudes on tiktok presenting as queer…

Reminds me of that quote (might be from The Celluloid Closet, I forget) that goes something like “I spent my life translating straight films to my queer life, so when someone calls my stuff universal I say ‘fuck you, its gay. Made by gays, for gays, about gays. Now you have to do the hard work to translate it to your…

I really think he (and his team) leaned into it, especially after all of the shipping that him and Louis Tomlinson got while they were in One Direction. While Louis has essentially settled down, had kids, and keeps to himself, Harry still wants to be a superstar, so there’s gotta be something compelling about him to…

Eh, I don’t think him saying it’s more than a story about guys being gay is necessarily homophobic. It’s a tough needle to thread for stories featuring underrepresented groups to be upfront about the representation but also not have it be tokenized or othered and then ignored because of it (like “Oh it’s a gay film”…

She might have only read the top tweet, but I think calling her egotistical for being like “Whoa, stop trying to compare me to some other actress. I have all these accomplishments and an amazing career I’m proud of” isn’t that absurd.

Ah, but you see controversy on the internet both a) momentarily relieves boredom and b) drives clicks. Now, if you’ll excuse me, I think I’ll go see if I can’t pit John Cho and Simu Liu against each other.

The word incomparable can be defined as being completely different from someone else. She seems to be saying that she has her own successes that she is very proud of and comparing her to Zendaya is like comparing apples and oranges. They aren’t the same and not trying to be the same.

Except it does?

They also come with a feeling of a) Keke Palmer has not accomplished as much as she actually has and b) Zendaya doesn’t deserve her fame. So saying wait a second, let’s set the record straight on what I’ve accomplished is fair play to her.

I think that is just a matter of the demographic you are polling. To the original posters demo she might not be a household name but for millions of people she is. Not to mention she has a diverse enough catalog that people who don’t know her know of at least one thing she was in no matter how niche (i.e. collabing on…

Sure. Except I had no idea who Zendaya was until Euphoria hit.

Maybe she thinks that, because she’s accomplished so much, she hasn’t been held back — she has conquered — so she doesn’t want to be held up as an example of victimhood. And that to compare her to another actress, saying that Palmer somehow doesn’t have as bright of a star, is insulting to both of them and their…

I for one am outraged—outraged!—that Page failed to display sufficient loyalty and deference to a television program he’s no long involved with. What is he, some sort of “professional” who sees acting as some sort of “job,” which involves “performing a role” in exchange for “monetary compensation”?

In the books Daphne is a just a glorified extra after her book. I think that’s fine, better that they let her go too and let the rest of the Bridgertons shine in their own individual stories. Usually all the siblings are only together for the very funny Pall Mall scenes which I do wish Page would return for and…