java-princess-old
Java-Princess
java-princess-old

We'd been hearing rumor this for a while, but with Chrome, not Firefox. I don't believe Mozilla has any part in this but I'm ready to stand corrected.

This is just the Bayes theorem in plain English.

Put electronics in the microwave for a few seconds to frizzle them. Take the item back and say it doesn't work. No you don't want a replacement, you needed it Saturday so you bought another one from Radio Shack. Item still appears new and unused, no water damage or scratches etc. - it just doesn't work. The store will

"Sorry, but I just can't get over how mindfuckingly stupid that line is."

If they can't be bothered to ensure a test is rigorous then no matter how many categories the results are invalid due to tester (voluntary or involuntary) bias

This article has bugs.

And don't forget that when you spread honey on your toast you're spreading the regurgitated spit of millions of insects. (Might not be wholly accurate on the spit part but that was for effect)

Hey, you've survived till now eating them - what harm are they doing?

This knowledge seriously compromises my vegetarianism. I will never eat anything again.

Aww! what cute little eyes the bug has!

I think what's going on is everone has a different setup - different memory, different drive speeds, different OSs, different number of other apps running, different malware protection, different GPU availability. Each and everyone of these contributes to the startup speed, the page load speed, the javascript

"The downside are those stupid websites that won't even TRY to work if you're not running IE or FF"

You can't keep quoting this test - it wasn't rigorous, they used 64bit IE9 which has the old unrevised javascript engine. IE9-32 bit consistently, in every js test ever devised beats the others hands down. Don't believe me? Of course you don't so try it; don't read the results of others' possibly biased surveys, don't

self-depreciating dear, unless you're making yourself obsolete.

So, is it possible to connect a pc web browser (any flavor) to Amazon's SPDY protocol servers and browse like a Kindle?

but that accent is so sexy.

Oh, sorry. However don't extensions open up a process for each one whether you use it or not, thereby consuming memory and processor time? Your comment on browser space, although refering to something else made me think.

I think ODOMZIG meant Chrome is for (liberals, who think everything is free) and he wasn't referring to the fact that browsers are free, just merely adding a description to liberals.

Take it from me then because I'm offering the same advice.

Promoting for the last paragraph.