So, you need to get kicked in the dick to know it sucks?

Meh

That's a lot of water balloons.

And you kind of missed the fact that in the 90s, there were no mainstream places for cartoons for adults. Meaning, Spielberg had them put the shows on (GASP! Here comes the big shocking reveal!) Kids WB. Why? Because WB had a block where they showed (GASP) cartoons. Since Spielberg made the show, had clout and…

You can put any video in response you like. Doesn't mean I'll push "play". I don't understand the fascination with the show and have no desire to watch it. *shrugs* I'm not making any judgements on people who DO watch it, I just know that I needn't get kicked in the dick to know that I dislike it.

I don't think I'd want to spend any time in Dubai judging by news reports of people running afoul of the law.

As I told someone else, go read/watch interviews with Spielberg about the show, as it was his baby. It was designed for parents of children who watched cartoons. It was put on WB Kids because, oddly enough, at the time there were no good venues for cartoons for adults. That and Spielberg had a LOT of clout at…

Tell ya what, go read or watch any interview with Spielberg about the show, or any of the producers or voice actors. Then come on back and apologize for shoving your foot into your mouth.

Buh-bye.

I'm gonna have to go ahead and stop you. Animaniacs was NOT created, designed or intended as a children's show. Watch or read any interview with anyone involved in that show. It was 100% intended and geared towards parents.

No.

I'm not saying they will ignore it. I'm simply saying that people are really pinning their hopes on people making these amazing games/innovations when there really is not reason to believe that. People are trying to claim that because every X1 (currently. We'll see how long it takes before they admit the X1 will…

New Coke was a goddamned abomination.

And focus groups are one thing, when the public vehemently and loudly says, "Wait, no" before you even fully announce the product, you might want to rethink your position. Especially in the home entertainment industry.

"Nobody will code for it if it's optional."

And you're fucking stupid if you think the forced inclusion is some sort of magic catch-all that will incite developers to create wondrous magiclands of joyous gaming. Just because it's there does not mean anything of value will be produced. It is not axiomatic that because…

Why would I WANT the new Kinect? I don't have any intention of using it, don't want it, find it offensive to jam into a system I WANT, find the argument that because it is there that developers will create amazing games utterly asinine and truly have no need for it.

I don't need my gaming system listening to me. I…

Yep, creating a very viable alternative to the PS4 is a really stupid idea.

Guaranteed they'd see a large spike in sales if they sold the X1 without the Kinect. But, no, that's stupid.

You don't "get" capitalism, do ya?

Yup, you're fucking retarded. (rolls eyes)

I can do that, too!

You're also assuming that people will actively develop quality games for the Kinect. Again, I do not share your optimism.

I see it as fully tone-deaf because of the massive outcry when the proposed changes were announced, well before the E3 confirmation. To so fully ignore your potential user base speaks volumes.

Amen

Since they're listening, why not give us an X1 without the Kinect?