No but see they are whores! We shouldn’t have double standards about man and women sexuality, but Kim and all her family are whores. And it is ok, feminism is always here to defend you from concern trolling and slut shaming but only if you are perfect little lady, not like those whores. Lots of Jezebel feminists and…

No but see they are whores! We shouldn’t have double standards about man and women sexuality, but Kim and all her family are whores. And it is ok, feminism is always here to defend you from concern trolling and slut shaming but only if you are perfect little lady, not like those whores. Lots of Jezebel feminists and…

I both dispute the premise that they need “saving” and/or that the church is the best place for anyone to become a better person...

Kris actually owns a church. I assume that’s the one they went to.

police that are fucking idiots when it comes to the topic of rape? I dunno, seems pretty accurate to real life to me.

I don't like Law and Order: SVU. There. I said it. I feel so free!

No. Just no.

Screams of idiot parents to me. For some reason parents think everyone wants to hear about their baby's sh*t.

I think a lot of people forgot what its like to be that age, too. I would have been mortified. And other kids would have been dicks about it.

Stupid.

It's totally rational for parents to assume that their children are highly unlikely to retroactively give a damn

Because she has no control over the entire fucking world seeing it. Every time we needed a picture for some damn elementary school project, my mother would try to send me to school with some embarrassing baby photo. Since this was back when dinosaurs roamed the Earth, the pictures were on actual photo stock, and I…

I don't know. They've apparently secured a signature that allows them to possibly humiliate her by putting this photo in her senior yearbook. Beyond the possibility that the parents are joking and wouldn't actually do that, does a kid of that age have the capacity to understand what may constitute future…

I think at this point you're arguing for the sake of arguing.

Jealous? What an odd (and extraordinarily rude) response. Why would you assume that only people who don't have kids could grow weary of your baby photos? NARCISSISTIC?!?

Get real. I know this seems like a crazy idea, but there are some people who have no interest in having children and aren't jealous that we don't have children. You wouldn't like it if I posted 15 pictures of my pet a day, why do I need to see more than 1 picture of your kid a day? I'm not saying don't post…

Yeah totes jealous of the sleepless nights, tantrums, poopy diapers and misery-loves-company 'tude of you and other parents.

Jealous? Serious? http://jezebel.com/5916743/the-tyranny-of-shes-just-jealous

Just to offer a bit of perspective from the other side...if we are FB friends and I haven't hidden your profile, I probably want to see pictures of your kids. However, what I do not want is you to post, one at a time, 15 different incredibly similar pictures of your baby, so that I have to scroll through 15 pictures…

I think the term jealous is a little harsh. To assume we're jealous because you have kids and we don't is a major stretch and just further perpetuates the idea that women are jealous of each other for: being prettier, fertile, having awesome earlobes, whatever.