The spider bite features in every major version of the character, the web shooters vary — originally in the comic he built them, but some versions have taken the Occam's-razor approach of making them part of him with the other powers.

They mostly get a side plot.

Eat those cookies before they notice.

You've got the numbers for the first Amazing Spider-Man there. The second one was down to $202 million domestically (foreign was up about $10 million) — which really wasn't a good direction to be going in, especially for a film with at least one big part of the ending that might sour viewers on further sequels.

I'd guess at some point someone enumerated which characters were part of which rights. Considering the way characters move back and forth between Marvel books, when you're selling rights to only some of them, what's actually being sold is an important question. (And it's probably best not to underestimate the details…

Kang first appeared as Rama-Tut in the Fantastic Four. (Or Rama-Tut appeared in FF before Kang did in the Avengers, and it was only a bit later they were said to be the same character.)

It's more likely to look like a good contribution to Netflix's back catalogue with a wrap-up rather than an abrupt cancellation, I'd think.

In a Polish factory.

You could do Brock's obsession without really bringing Spider-man on stage, and have the symbiote take its image from the obsession rather than being previously bonded to Spidey. Maybe use the Venom origin as a science project by the Parkers as its reason to hate him too.
(That assumes that it's "Spider-man not…

Maybe it gets going in act one or act one, though.

Groucho, only it's not very clear if he's trying to get their help or just wind them up.

You just need enough gun for that.

I liked what the film did thematically, and there were a lot of really good sequences, but the actual explanations of what was happening seemed rather ropier.

Grim futures are something of a theme in the X-Men comics, but there have been several different ones rather than a particular fate being set in stone.

It's been like that ever since they introduced this DON character.

She did get 2 more years of a parliament where the Conservatives are the largest party, assuming no election before the end of the maximum term. Which was a great use of her pre-existing political capital, I'm sure.

That was at least as much 'getting turned loose on another enemy' as it was 'redemption', though.

Still levelling up its Social Link with the AV Club.

I have absolutely no clue why Brits love this movie so much.
I think it chimes with a 'plucky little Britain taking on the world' streak in the national character, which can turn more than a bit boorish. (Recent cases include the Sun projecting the words "Dover and Out" on the White Cliffs to celebrate Article 50 being…

The Thals might seem like a bit of an odd fit with the way the threat of the Daleks has been dialled up from the RTD era onwards.