The only reason they are famous, because you made them famous, for no reason what so ever.

The Kardashians are the Kardashians, and I will painstakingly track their every move to the grave.

So you sexually harassed your coworkers?  Ya, good you worked when people looked the other way.  Creepy though that you admit that. 

Hopefully your tombstone won’t read “he got regularly outraged on behalf of sexual harassers”

But I have now heard of 3 names I have never heard of before, so I guess it all worked.

The hypersensitivity of Cyberpunk super fans continues

And they’d be constantly crashing the eagles!

I came here just to pay tribute to Garret.

What is this whataboutism bullshit? Racist Star Wars fans are shitty. Shitty Snyder stans are shitty. You aren’t “worse” or “better” than them. You’re both equally shitty.

.....Did you just accuse the company that basically invented handheld platforms, along with making consoles like the Wii, Switch and Virtual Boy, as a company that doesn’t take risks?

NO!

The Dick Tracy timeline?

Can we settle on a style guide standard whereby we never call these stupid influencers by their handles after the initial introduction? Writing an entire article about the beef between “Ice Poseidon” and “Coffeezilla” and continuing to use those absurd names throughout, just proves that we’re truly in the dumbest…

Good for the creator, but this sucks. Wordle seemed like some part of the Old Internet had reemerged to delight people with a mildly frustrating fun word game. It’s going to suck when this goes behind a paywall. 

It’s so far out, it’s in the stratosphere of a completely different planet with a nitrogen/oxygen atmosphere. There.

Dilly dally shilly shally, amirite gamers?

No dude, it’s not a “people with kids” thing it’s an “asshole taking off the mask” thing. I have plenty of friends with kids who managed to remain good people and still call out bullshit when they see it, boiling it down to the kids is a hand-wavy way to dismiss criticism.

Your first point ignores that mechanical efficiency of bank transactions is a net positive where block chain has no centralized need to attain efficiency. So even if its true they both use similar amounts of energy one will always try to use less to save more money, the other just exists.

Imagine a group of nerds having the same interest and putting money together to bring to life a project, while everyone has a share in this project via tokens and can vote what and when to do stuff. More like shares in a company, but now everyone can have access, not just accredited investors with 100k+ of funding.

I have read the blog post and the FAQ and I still have no idea what they are trying to achieve here.