Yeah, seriously, wtf was that? Kimmel has been doing great work, he’s stuck by his guns, he sticks up for things which we know are important, but no, gotta get in that ball-kick of a last paragraph because oh no, the late night comedian had a joke about having the president on his show.

Why would something *only* need further control if it was specifically gambling?

I thought it was that the men assume that they need to explain *because* a person is a woman, that they, as women, are therefore less informed, not just that the guy in question doesn’t know the [unmentioned] history of the woman.

As opposed to everyone else, who *does* have the insight and intelligence to comment on things outside the specific purview of their job..?

And they call it Inland Empire.

Oh sure. I should say that it’s possible K died, but everywhere I’ve seen makes it out to be like this big obvious thing, when it’s really not at all - he’s been shown taking grievous wounds, not blinking, and moving little the entire movie. But oh well.

I felt Luv was great. You could tell that she didn’t enjoy her orders, but was forced to do them anyway, and that in the stress of stopping the individual who might bring about the freedom of her kind, kinda snapped.

Also, I have absolutely no idea why people are saying that K is dead. He seemed pretty alive to me, and…

A few things:
-the “new model” Wallace killed was played by another actress
-the giant nude Joi was a generic version, and it’s use of Joe helped echo that fact that some facets of K’s Joi was engrained, and that it just told him what he wanted to hear - not necessarily that this made their love fake, but rather that he…

Did you miss the obvious implications of the scene with the Joi ad and what he meant when he told Deckard he died or

Ok Weird Al

Oh a new form in Dragon Ball how unique and interesting
</s>

When you say the NRA has an “ungodly amount of money”, what are you talking about? It can’t be referring to the lobby that spent less than 1M, right? It should be so easy to outspend their peanuts, yet for some reason, no one does...

Why

It’s not that I expect billions, it’s that for the number “1.2" in relation to the franchise - and indeed any movie with 7 sequels - it would be *VASTLY* more surprising if it was anything *but* billions.

Why do people always say “billions with a B” for sub 100B numbers? A F&F movie making 1.2M would be a much, much, *MUCH* larger surprise than it making 1.2B. Who on earth is confusing it for millions? What significant, years-long, global media event with some of the biggst stars in the world reaps less than 100M?

Billi…

Is the gunplay still absurdly shallow like the one from 2015?

Thanks for a more thorough breakdown than “controversial”! I’m surprised you’d say that an 80 mile EV is so rare though - I thought those were somewhat common in the total cohort of EVs?

Maybe so, but everything I’ve seen has the pro-control side spending orders of magnitude less, which I simply don’t understand.

How so? According to who? What have they published to break down their argument?

Edit: I should say that I am genuinely interested in learning, because that paper seemed pretty solid.

Sure there is