You mean how people saw the fire being emitted from a missile, standing on light saturated Long Island, from a dozen miles away?

BTW: weight is counteracted by lift. A sudden loss of weight would equal to a sudden gain in lift. Lift = up.

That site doesn’t answer my questions:

For example, A loaded 1983 Volkswagen Golf/Rabbit GTI cost around $8000 brand new, which translated to just over $19,000 in today’s money. Fast forward to today, where a 2015 Golf GTI with all options ticked would set you back more than $31,000.

a) What motivation is there for shooting down TWA 800

You’re starting to sound like your off your meds.

It still comes in stick?! That’s amazing! Go Cadi!!

I second Jake’s comment.

You’re starting to sound like. 911 truther and Benghazi troll.

No, they aren’t. Shooting someone is the preferred method of assassination.

Any crash where there is a potential crime the FBI has a hand in. At first it appeared there might have been a bomb on the plane. Once they realized the real cause was a fault in the 747-200, one that was publicly known well before TWA800, it wasn’t a criminal case.

The CIA convinced morons (like you) that a 747 could climb after having its nose blown off as a way of attempting to explain away the hundreds of people who described the exact same missile trajectories.

There weren’t hundreds of eye witnesses. You do realize that right? And like I said, they aren’t reliable. During MH17 eye witnesses claim they saw a Ukrainian fighter jet attack MH17. Did you know that there was a cloud layer below 10k feet that day in Ukraine? It would have been physically impossible to see anything…

Believing that every plane crash is a massive government conspiracy actually makes you the dumbest motherfucker on the planet. A government, that can’t keep anything a secret even when they try.

Or please, go ahead and continue to believe that a falsified report about solid rocket fuel found on a stolen airline seat…

Eye witnesses are horribly unreliable in airline disasters. Especially when they have no idea what they are looking at until after the fact.

a) The hole was blown from the inside

What? We knew what took down MH17 almost within minutes of the plane going down. Russia continues to dispute the findings, but the evidence is there.

I’ve looked into the details. There’s literally no evidence to suggest it was a SAM.

There’s literally no evidence, nor does the way the debris fell suggest it was a missile.

The reconstruction of the air-frame indicated the center tank explosion.

I’m putting 100% of my chips in the bomb-on-board bet.

Because Russia. Seriously, you think Russia will give you a straight answer or twist the lives, and deaths, for Putin’s political gains, if you don’t think he’d do otherwise, you’re sadly mistaken. I’m just surprised they haven’t blamed a Ukranian missile or fighter jet at this point.