No they aren’t, they are hiring more people at a plant that ALREADY EXISTS in Mexico. They are going to retool the US facility and build different cars there.

They are building cars at a factory that already exists in mexico. That factory has excess manufacturing capability so ford is going to use that capability to allow them to retool the US plant to make a different vehicle.

Nobody ever said you had to keep the OEM twin turbo set up if you kept the rotary. Keep the 13B, convert it to single turbo.

Yep, exactly. And as much as I would like ford hiring more people in the US, I would rather have them maintain the quality and safety of their cheaper products.

And profit clearly isn’t the only thing that matters because if it was they would just close the US plant rather than building more vehicles here.

The factory in Mexico was redudant, it won’t be anymore and it will enable ford to build higher profit margin vehicles in the US which means potentially better wages/more jobs at the plants in the US.

No they aren’t, the factory is already there it just has excess capacity.

Because that is completely ridiculous from a business standpoint. Why build a redudant factory? That is a recipe for layoffs.

Because they would need to build an entire factory just to produce cars which they already have the tooling to produce at a different factory.

It’s more about gearing that anything. My 540i is more heavy and less powerful than my MS3 but it is MUCH easier to go way way too fast(for public roads) in the 540i because it has really really long gears.

The Nissan will feel just as cheap if not cheaper at the same price point.

The current sho isn't worthy of the sho name. It's not a midsizer, it doesn't have a manual option, and it weighs as much as a house.-former SHO owner.

Hitting the Lincoln isn't what caused the car to split in half, that much is pretty obvious. The pole holding up those stop lights, which has skid marks right at its base, it most likely what caused the car to split in half.

Ultimately it's about the path of least resistance for all the energy the car has when it hits an object. It's a combination of factors but most importantly the car needs to be moving pretty quickly and hit something small but extremely strong and resistant to moving/bending. So a tree or a steel pole that doesn't…

Go fuck yourself. I am most certainly not one of the people who uses their phone while they drive. You must have had some pretty shitty schooling or some pretty shitty role models to make the assumptions you do.

Lol I’m done. You are beyond help. The people who are playing Pokemon go while driving would be doing something else on their phone while driving if Pokemon go didn't exist. Considering how wise you claim to be and how condescending you have been, it's pretty fucking funny that you haven't thought about that.

Fuck you? There is nothing childish about what I’m saying. I don’t play Pokemon go, I’m not interested in it. That said, it’s fucking stupid to blame a game for how the USER chooses to use the game.

No not really, but fine let's apply it to something as trivial as Pokemon go. Because some people use alcohol irresponsibly, all people who use alcohol should be judged.

They could potentially design the truck with a network of smaller battery packs which can be recharged individually. Since the battery packs are smaller they can be fully charged at currently/easily achievable rates in a short amount of time.

Why the fuck should I care if I fit into your definition of maturity, or anyone else’s for that matter, if what I’m doing doesn’t effect me being a functional part of society? Oh wait that’s right, I shouldn’t and don’t.