jacquescampbell
JaqcuesCampbell
jacquescampbell

When you filed the lawsuit, why did you sue NASCAR with a $500 million lawsuit when you could’ve...

Due to a glitch in the universe, replacing the heater core in a ‘99 Expedition will cause it to spawn about 30 extra screws. Theoretically, this glitch could be exploited to generate infinite screws and violate conservation of mass.

I’m not crazy, but my LOW PRICES are!!!

I must be missing something. I just don’t find these guys entertaining.

When you woke up this morning, did you think of yourself as someone who would call the teenaged survivor of a mass shooting a liar on the internet, or are you surprised to learn that about yourself?

Uh, something’s definitely growing on that X4 and it needs to have it checked out by a doctor.

This tower?

The Orvis edition. Because let’s never forget that Jeep did this:

I’m not sure you have had enough to drink today or too much.

The inaccuracy I was referring to isn’t about whether Bonaly was the first to do a back flip to one blade—it’s about whether the move was banned because of Bonaly. The rules made no distinction between a two foot landing or a one foot landing in terms of making it illegal. The difficulty of a one foot landing was

What the fuck are you talking about? Did you even read the article. Did you even read the headline? Here’s a hint: the inaccuracy being pointed out is not whether the flip was landed on one blade.

I cannot tell if this is a serious comment or not.

They also released a study concluding that if you read this article and then immediately toss out their data to insist that, no, actually you stream new music all the time because you are a very knowledgeable music person, you are missing the point entirely to be insufferable.

Yeah but let’s talk about the panel gaps

Now playing

Nothing, and I mean NOTHING, will ever beat this. 1:05 is so good it actually makes you want to cry

Did the same guy design the FXX-K? I like it.

This is a really poor characterization of the F-35 program. It is not intended to replace the F-22, it’s intended to augment the F-22. It’s primarily a replacement for the F-16 in the Air Force, and older F/A-18s in the Navy.

We have allocated roughly 350+ Billion dollars on the F35 project to replace fighter jets (F18s and F22s) that are still more reliable and dependable than their replacement. The program is estimated to cost over a 50 year period: 900 billion to 1.1 trillion.

The ISS has cost taxpayers about 50 billion since 1994 and is

Here’s what I have a hard time squaring:

Does it have to be anti- Trump blah blah blah?