I simply said she wanted attention. I didn’t say she was being cruel or negative in any way.

Such social liberalization has been so very needed and I am a person who believes in utter freedom of expression for all people, so long as they are not physically harming another person.

I’ll ignore your non-sequitur about other cultures, but calling Ms. Curry’s perspective regressive leads me to believe that you think it progressive for women to display themselves for everyone all the time. Yes, that’s hyperbolic. Feel free to correct me.

I do treat all human beings with respect, irrespective of how they dress, so long as they are not physically harming someone.

You mean like Matt Lauer at work? Or Louis CK with fellow comics?

My point is that “rationality, wisdom and basic human kindness” have nothing to do with GOP voters here in Virginia, either.

I got it from Joe Rogan.

That’s why I have NEVER done that. And NEVER will.

I never said that nor did I imply it.

C’mon, you know that I mean in a pharmacological way.

Really?

You lose. And you just admitted you don’t know how to read.

It can’t be said enough: most people are simply too stupid to know how stupid they are.

Uh, my GOP parents here in Virginia would like a word, my friend.

If that’s what you get out of my posts, you need to learn how to read.

So are you saying that many, many men aren’t turned on by seeing the shape of a woman’s body?

What’s weird is that I never said anything of the sort.

Repeating the same points doesn’t make them right. (Or attacking my person with some abject bullshit.)

It’s two separate teams, each with their own management and readership.

And this post has zero points and an ad hominem.