For those who have the obvious question about her viewership vs. industry trend that wasn’t explained in this post:

Next up, Puma sweats.

I don’t disagree about the role of R&D and expedition credibility but their high-end technical stuff is a tiny fraction of their business and barely even marketed and their high-end fashion stuff isn’t for outdoor enthusiasts so I don’t think the trickle down effect happens in the same way now that the market is so…

I don’t disagree about the role of R&D and expedition credibility but their high-end technical stuff is a tiny fraction of their business and barely even marketed and their high-end fashion stuff isn’t for outdoor enthusiasts so I don’t think the trickle down effect happens in the same way now that the market is so…

That makes sense, thanks (to the extent that any arugument that having someone kneel on your neck after you’re initially coherent enough to say you can’t breathe didn’t kill you makes sense).

I meant overall. WIP is a tiny portion of the brand that relatively few know about compared to the heritage. My point was even the regular stuff is popular among an audience that Dickies isn’t, and not in an ironic sense.

Carhartt is also a semi-hot streetwear brand now. The logo beanie has been a huge seller with a very different crowd in the last few years and they have WIP.

TNF has much more varied customer segments as a result of that history and their larger size. There are several varieties of fashion consumers in between the basics stuff that competes with Columbia, cheap Nike, etc. and the enthusiast and technical segments that compete with Patagonia and others. And they also go all…

By what measure? TNF is still likely more that 2x as big as Patagonia and 10x Arcteryx from a volume standpoint. Patagonia obviously has their loyal customer base, many of whom care about their values but outside of their CSR initiatives, they haven’t really been relevant in the industry for good reasons (vs. the…

They already did. My issue is that we have the actual toxicology from the autopsy so this evidence doesn’t add anything to that debate.

They did but they already have the toxicology from the autopsy so this evidence doesn’t add anything to that debate.

I don’t follow the logic. Maybe there are relevant details in the ruling that would explain it but it seems that the prior arrest evidence would only be relevant if Chauvin saw it and knew that Flloyd was the same person, leading to a hypothetical concern about a potential pattern of behavior and the likelihood of it…

Most of my favorite duos aren’t really true “odd” couples (Harold & Maude, Withnail & Marwood, Lenny & Carl, etc.). This couple that fits the very traditional comedic definition comes to mind:

Yeah, that’s where I picked up the term.

Estate planning is about all I can come up with.

42 different locations to note, on individual slides. Chef’s kiss.

The NYT needs to sue them for civil harassment on her behalf. I am not a lawyer but this also seems to potentially run afoul of both California (if that’s where their broadcast originated) and NY criminal harassment laws as the posting served no purpose other than to harass her, which is made explicitly clear given the…

This would’ve been an entirely appropriate response (1:58):

This calls into question the judgement of Lynch and Wintour twice now as this development was entirely foreseeable, if not inevitable. Edward Enninful can’t take the reins of the entire brand soon enough.