Yes. Having studied social norms in the medieval and early modern period, and having read a considerable amount about material culture, there are at least two kinds of etiquette:
Yes. Having studied social norms in the medieval and early modern period, and having read a considerable amount about material culture, there are at least two kinds of etiquette:
Rich people? Japan’s rules seem pretty in-line with cleanliness and politeness, and have nothing to do with wealth.
Even if you don’t remember all the niceties, simply making an effort not to be a loud obnoxious slob is probably a good idea regardless of which country you’re in.
Probably more like:
- There are not enough woke men to go around
I’m not 11
You could say the same about Nintendo, except they actually allow cross-play.
nothing to do with art or creativity.
Yay!
Also, please remember to keep transphobes and TERFs in the grays where they belong. No one needs to see that.
You conveniently left out the next sentence.
Invoking this passage is a pathetic attempt to claim legitimacy - a child of three could see through it. Taking Romans literally it means it is never right to protest against governments, no matter how despotic. Something to throw back in Sessions face if he ever talks about foreign governments suppressing protest.
And yet...
The difference is that that Perkins isn’t compiling books of children’s drawings, then turning around and selling them for $60 each.
That’s a Playstation problem not Nintendo or Fortnite. Sony wants to be isolated dicks and not get involved with crossplatform other than PC, that is their mistake. I have a lot of issues on PC trying to join a PS4 buddy, but if I try to join friends on Xbox, no sweat.
Sure, if you’re some kind of angsty, rebellious teenager, that’s probably what you think Art is. But in reality, Art is meant to incite an emotional response to it. Being offended is one of those, but it certainly is not the only response, and offending people isn’t necessarily Art. A lot of it is just people being…
Oh I see, the whole killed 3000 people in a war. It’s a war people die, why does that make people uncomfortable?
So you actively are not interested in the context of why there was outrage in this case? Just a protip, if you don’t care enough to educate yourself, it’s best to not lament how “the world if a tiny step from total disaster.”
He said China was the country of worms and Korea was the country of rape.
Shut up. I realized school gets out soon but its not summer yet. Pay attention in class or you’ll keep heading down this dumb road.
You’re kind of missing one of the key elements of this story; the dude killed exactly 3712 people with his sword when he was a soldier. The Rape of Nanking happened in December of 1937. The author was pulling one of those annoying hidden messages/imagery things so popular with racist folks: See also 1488 and that…
Since folks may not click through links... some context.