You can’t get drunk, aggressively pursue sexual contact with someone, and then call yourself a victim. That’s not how any of that works.

See that’s what bothers me. She basically says “I’m a victim” and lets people assume that Jackson, a black man, is to blame. She should have made clear who exactly had victimized her.

I was also skeptical of her claim. Many survivors of sexual assault take quite some time to come to terms with what happened to them; IMMEDIATELY calling oneself a victim did not seem in keeping with what we normally see.* It’s not uncommon for survivors of sexual assault to emphasize that they are survivors, not…

It’s quite possible that the tape shows that she was the aggressor.

If that Jewish woman with natural curls does not have natural type 4 coily hair but manipulates it to appear that way then she would be appropriating black hair.

This aide needs to find another job.

Le sigh. I love when white people pretend “white supremacy” is a new movement anywhere in this country. It’s been here since the first white people stepped foot on this land. Please stop it with this disingenuous nonsense of a new movement of white supremacy. It’s not new.

Wow. You’re an insensitive piece of shit, aren’t you? That was a rhetorical question; we already know the answer is “yes.”

Why are you making up alternative facts? She did not merely “generally and vaguely encourag[e] him to kill himself;” rather, she ACTIVELY encouraged him and provided guidance on how to commit the act, including literally during the act itself when he confessed that he did not want to go through with it.

I’m not sure I get this line of thinking. How is it sad for the person who is still alive? Because she will go to jail? Why would you think we, as a society, should encourage - i.e., by not punish - her behavior? Her role in the suicide is befitting of the conviction she received. There are a ton of people sitting on…

I’m not trying to be snarky but you do know that Google exists, right? If you type any of these words into the Google search box, you will immediately receive answers. Never disappointing to see that you want to spoon information that is readily available to you.

Are you daft? Of course, negative reviews hurt the theaters and their actors. Wow, you are literally dumb.

Is it unethical to write a negative review of a play because you are a bigoted piece of shit? It’s funny that the only person you see as hurt in this process is the white woman. What about the minorities she is lambasting in her reviews? Do you have no compassion of these people? That was a rhetorical question; you’ve…

Ah, you’re a racist. That explains it.

Again, why do you think she is entitled to keep her job? If you are a shitty theater reviewer, then you don’t get to keep your job. That’s the end of it.

Why do you care if she keeps her job? You seem to think that she is somehow entitled to free tickets and to work as a theater critic. Why do you think this? Please explain.

So instead the theaters should give her free tickets so she can continue to lambaste minorities? Look, actions have consequences. If she can’t work because she writes shitty, bigoted reviews then that’s her own problem.

What white nonsense is this?

Do people simply “self-segregate” or is there more to it - i.e., at least some of the racial segregation we see is secondary to institutional racism?

I cannot love someone who believes that women, POC, Muslims, and LGTBQ people are not equal to straight white Christian cis-men.