Batman's a scientist.

What is there to reference in new episodes though? If you want to reference Homer and co., you need to go back to the 90s.

No one watches, but the brand still sells. Last season it was less popular than "Americas Funniest Home Videos." Simpsons has lots of crap available. You can get anything Simpsons now.

Because characters have no history or continuity, butthurt goldfish.

Or perhaps, loser who uses an old Simpsons reference to prove his nerdiness, I don't spend all day seeking the approval of morons?

It is none of those things. You like shows that aren't good because you think liking unpopular crap makes you better than everyone else. You have an "Archer" avatar. Pathetic.

He is Bill Dauterive without the redeeming qualities. He just makes Bob's life worse, but he stays around because bad writing. Same for the wife's sister. Family so have to deal with her.

The mom is too overbearing and self-absorbed to sit idly by while Bob screws up something for Glasses. The story didn't fit her. It didn't fit Bob either. He isn't an idiot who screws things up like that.

Because it allows them to be kids instead of annoying morons.

Blame the lazy hackneyed writing. The show needs characters with no redeeming qualities to throw a monkey wrench into the works to makes things "interesting." Teddy could have screwed up the flowers for Bob in many ways, but instead he just forces himself in at the end to make Bob's life worse because it is easy and…

It isn't just Bob's Burgers and not just this site. episode reviews are written by fans of the shows. Only intro reviews that focus on a few episodes are written by people who are more objective.

Gene cannot carry an episode. He is more annoying than anything else.
The holiday episodes are not good. I know it is valentimes, but that doesn't mean you need to do cliched character not getting any Valentines plot.

This episode was lousy. Voices were off. Plot wasn't good.
I particularly disliked the forcing of Bob into a wacky situation he wouldn't end up in. Bob cares about his kids and doesn't want to disappoint them. It would have made more sense for annoying Teddy to fuck over Bob by telling him to go to the warehouse in…

Gus was trying to protect his family. It was the same reason he let Malvo go when in the beginning. He did not want Molly out trying to apprehend Malvo. It makes more sense that it played out that way. Molly being able to take down or take out Malvo would have not been in keeping with either character.

It was very not-Bobs-Burger. I could see if the entire thing was a musical. Or if there was actual danger for the family. Or if anything happened at all. But it was not a musical. The family was never in danger. Nothing happened.

It is was really weird how they were only in the park because of him, but then they forgot that he invited them there. They know the park owner. He knows them. Why wouldn't he give that thing to Tina or put the girl on the roller coaster?

They did not have a plot though. They just had to keep the kids at the amusement park after getting denied entry to roller-coaster.

They already are though. Several plots have had them spend all of their savings on some stupid waste of money without issue.

That was the only funny line of the episode.

That is what I thought. The guy is a family friend of sorts. He only hates Bob. It would have made more sense just to give it to her and let Tina do whatever Tina would do with an ugly wooden horse.