Reminds me of:

Perforation means, the page is partially cut, to ease separation. It doesn’t mean or cause a change in the color tone of the page/sheet on the two sides of the perforation.

“Yes, the outlines match somewhat... Pixel perfect?... If you think that, you must be really stupid...”

They’re clearly NOT hand drawn. If they would be, the outlines and the shades wouldn’t match pixel perfect. They do, and this proves that he was working on a processed photo that’s been printed out. Which completely and totally contradicts the definition of an artistic drawing.

Well, my point is, these things are not artistic drawings by any means, and the guy making them is only as much an “artist” as is any kid drawing in a coloring book.

“Yeah absolutely. You are still very much wrong”

Another example. Mad Max 2. Anyone else still feeling to comment about me being wrong? ...... Yeah. Thought so....

For example: (try to overlay the two pictures, and you’ll get a pixel-perfect match of the outlines!)

“Artist”. “Drawings”. My shiny metal. These are direct captures of exact frames from each movie, and can be generated easily with any advanced photo editor. Look like how I created a “drawing” of Star Wars in just 5 seconds. And I didn’t even download Photoshop for that.

With cases like this (ie. people getting imprisoned temporarily for essentially nothing) happening now every week in China, this appears to me like the regime is trying to intimidate its citizens, who are obviously getting less and less afraid of the oppressive government and adopting more and more of the customs and…

But it’s not the speed of the blood that’s increasing the absorption ratio, but the increase in the cross-section of the veins

“so when blood flows faster it absorbs more green light.”

Oh, the irony of a person with zero reading comprehension criticizing the intellectual capabilities of others.... A person unable to grasp the difference between attributing something to somebody and that person actually saying it. Somebody unable to understand the difference between the article contradicting itself…

This article is contradicts itself. First it claims that Strumia said, that women ARE worse at physics, than men. Then it says that Strumia said, that women CAN’T be as good at physics as men. However, these are obviously two very different things. One is about actual performance and the other about capability.

This is umpossible. Everyone knows the Earth is only 4000-6000 years old. /s

“Isn’t it silly for decent lads to have women’s perfume?” Boshirov said. “The customs are checking everything, they would have questions as to why men have women’s perfume in their luggage. We didn’t have it.”

“According to the complaint, Alcor reasoned that Dr. Pilgeram’s entire body was not frozen because it was “medically unable to be preserved.””

In spite of previous events, nobody can tell me this wasn’t intentional to get the 15 minutes of fame for herself and for the locality

Reminds me of

If the story with this internet cafe is this lady’s best one or the most recent one (and why wouldn’t she name the best or the most the recent, when asked for an example), then this is definitely a non-issue, and she’s just trying to pull off a publicity stunt.