I’ll just leave this here. It’s totally on-topic, I swear. Well, it gets there at about 45 seconds into the video.

In My Feelings dance challenge? Sounds like a perfect test to identify Trump voters with 100% accuracy.

What could go possibly wrong with there?

1. Keep funding of NASA at an all-time low

“Even without going into technicalities, that sounds a lot like the “If gun control cannot stop 100% of gun deaths, then we don’t need it!!” argument.”

“You have your wires crossed. Your post stated, simultaneously, that https doesn’t prevent “any” data from being stolen (your words) followed by it prevents “some ways”. “

Should have read before you posted, shouldn’t have you?

“It is true. He used the phrase “less likely” which is altogether accurate.”

“It’s a strange argument to have though, that because it’s not a complete solution, that it shouldn’t be implemented.”

You just rebutted your own argument by pointing out that “secure” / “not secure” labeling is binary, while the likelyhood of your data getting stolen is a chance, obviously with a value between 0% and 100%. Because of that, the former can not be used to represent the latter, by definition, and it is nonsensical to try…

Your reading comprehension failed you again, didn’t it?

“I have to ask you this. How in your mind does removing X number of ways to steal personal information not make it less likely that the information is stolen?”

“The more sites using HTTPS, the less likely it is for any of your private data to be stolen. “

I’m wondering when these “scientist” will find the aliens that they think have inspired this painting. Because as a poster piece of expressionist (and not realistic) art, it can’t possibly be that those clouds had no real world inspiration whatsoever, and have just been put there by Munch because they added to or…

I can’t remember it containing any (claimed) password, but the text and the wording was essentially the same.

You didn’t read the article, did you?

“There’s a twisted **new** sextortion scam going around”

Because you can get an iPhone even with just $0 down payment (or $299 most), I’d doubt it could be considered a signal of wealth. However, it’s definitely a signal that the person can be easily persuaded into buying a mediocre product with a heavy (over)price tag, that they absolutely do not need. And ultimately,…

“Scientists understand gravity pretty well”