So, there we have it. The guy is a time traveler. He authored a 2003 best practices document, that lead to - amongst others - Microsoft adopting those practices in 1993, in their Windows NT operating system. Thanks for the explanation, Bill.
So, there we have it. The guy is a time traveler. He authored a 2003 best practices document, that lead to - amongst others - Microsoft adopting those practices in 1993, in their Windows NT operating system. Thanks for the explanation, Bill.
The article said that this was “the guy who invented these standards” ie. that tell you to “create a password with at least so many characters, so many numbers, so many special characters, and maybe an uppercase letter”.
This guy invented these rules as much, as did Fran Drescher’s ex invent email.
Really dumb people thinking smart people are dumb is a well-known phenomenon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
And the winner is:
The word you’re looking for is not “eccentric” (unconventional, non-average), but “egocentric” (self-centered, self-obsessed). And it is the exact reason why he’s such a waste of a human life.
They look like popplers to me.
That sounds like a good idea only until you read a news report about some old woman who just had 27 pair of glasses stuck discovered under her eyelids.
Now go back and read what I wrote in my first reply to you!
“If you write something line-by-line or take something day-by-day, it means one of whatever unit at a time.”
Why do you say “it wasn’t a GIF”, when the only reference to a graphic format in the study “a GIF”? What format was it, if it wasn’t a GIF, and what proof do you have to bolster your claim that it was that format? Nothing, right?
They’re not saying they’re storing the bytes of a GIF file, but that they encode the GIF file’s contents into the DNA. These are two very different things. You’re obviously not as pedantic as you think you’re.
“That’s what pixel by pixel means.”
You’re confusing “pixel by pixel” with “each pixel, one at a time” here.
“The idea is to create molecular recorders that function in cells to capture things in the cell or cell environment .... so that an experimenter doesn’t have to go in and disrupt the system to collect data.”
Yeah, you keep telling that to yourself. Then maybe, but just maybe, a single person on Earth, you, will believe that. But even then everyone else will just keep thinking: what a retard, trying to bend reality, just because he’s unable to admit having been wrong, all the time.
For this to work properly you’d need a camera that can measure absolute depth/distances very accurately. So, this definitely won’t be a feature of iOS 11, but maybe that of iPhone 8 - if the latter will have a depth sensor. If it won’t, then this definitely can’t work as advertised. Well, at least not on an Apple…
Again: Your argument is stupid, because volume and power buttons are also (physical) buttons - so I couldn’t possibly have meant what you implied I meant, even when not considering the slide-out keyboard. It’s also stupid to assume that I somehow didn’t know that the phone had a slide-out keyboard, after I’ve owned it…
So, when will we finally rename it to Urectum, to end these stupid jokes?
* the more UNeducated people are in their country - that is