I think you should have your logic circuits checked. Because you’re obviously seeing logical contradictions where there clearly aren’t any, while are not recognizing them where they actually are.

“Safety isn’t just a measure of peak reaction capability, but also repeatability/consistency”

“aside from all of the (good) points others have already made refuting you here”

“Even if what you say is true, which I do not believe it is, you discount perhaps the most crucial interval, perception time. When a driver is paying attention, normal perception time is roughly .75 seconds and reaction time is another .75 seconds. ”

“Self-driving can perform auto-braking which minimizes colision force from front AND back, which no human can do”

“The Tesla’s warning buzzer goes off a full second before the car ahead on the right hits it’s brakes, and that is telling as the car ahead on the right had a clearly superior sightline/viewpoint”

“It’s not really what you implied, the Tesla saw the accident indicators well before a human would have “

“I love that you’ve completely ignored every comment that correctly pointed to the other car’s superior vantage point for being the reason they braked. “

The Tesla’s driver had not _exactly the same_ view as the driver in the other lane. It might not even had a view as good as the car in the other lane (even though I wouldn’t accept that as a fact). Still, the video proves that it had a view good enough on it to see it coming. And the latter is the only thing that…

I’m not arguing against this technology per se. I’m arguing against glorifying it, and making unfounded claims about its superiority, where in fact we have no factual data to actually back up those claims.

“You mean the car that was several carlengths ahead “

“And which data do you base your facts on?”

The only not understanding the argument here is obviously you. Because you’re not even realizing that I’m not arguing about what you’re arguing about.

“You could not tell that the red car was gonna crash before the warning goes off.”

“Thank you for ignoring how it’s safer as the Tesla driver was notified earlier than the much closer car on the right”

“So with all the data available in the video, had the car in front of the Tesla been a Tesla, there wouldn’t have been an accident. “

“It’s not really what you implied, the Tesla saw the accident indicators well before a human would have IN THE SAME POSITION”

“The warning sound goes off before the crash even happens.”

And the Tesla did break for what? Also, does it matter what the exact trigger was (assuming it was different for each car, which was not proven) as long as the end result is the same, and that both have avoided the collision? What was the point you were to trying to make, but actually failed at?

“The car braked after the auto brake chime, it was a slow breaking. “