We see this in todays so called hyper-realistic paintings, which youtube is full of, too. Yet, most people tend to believe that those are really drawn "by (free)hand".

.

I think you should take classes in elementary logic. You seem to fail at the basics of logical conclusions.

You must be exceptionally stupid. He drowned just because his armor was too heavy to cross the river during combat (well, retreat, but that's also part of the combat). Get it?

Actually, there were kings, who were known to have died, just because their armor was unsuitable for combat. Like for ex. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_II_… who drowned in a creek, because his armor was too heavy.

The guy has it all backwards. It’s not the additional energy from the Sun, but the opposite: the minimum energy principle, and the fact that Earth as a whole tries to lower its total energy, that leads unavoidably to the forming of complex structures and self-preserving processes, like life, in the end.

No. That's not derivable from what I said. Maybe you should read it again, more carefully this time.

Right. Because it's porn that determines and shapes sexual preference, not the other way 'round (ie. that porn only satisfies and follows the already existing preferences). Oh, wait...

When it comes to anything related to sex, women don’t say what they really think, but what they think society expects them to say. So if this study is based on self-reporting, the results are pretty much useless.

Let me give you a tip where you can find even more Helium. I’ve marked it with a red arrow on the picture.

“Genes”. You keep using that word, but I don’t think it means what you think it means.

Was it a Tesla with the "summon" feature?

Thanks for proving my point. You obviously didn’t realize, but you just did that. You acknowledged, that for most part (that’s like 99.999999%) of Earth’s history there was no intelligent and technologically advanced life form living on the surface of the planet. The first one only emerged in the last few hundred…

If you’re referring to “malicious” AI that turns against its creator, then that could be a Great Filter only for its own creator. The AI itself, however, would still survive and be detectable.

No. The explanation is: there are no kind of “advanced” aliens out there we would or even could recognize as that. It’s a possibility, that’s far more likely, than what’s been argued for above, because it assumes far less things, than most alternative explanations (which all assume, that recognizable and detectable…

You’re beating a straw man there. He did not say we can assume anything. He just said that there’re other and far simple explanations for the observations (or actually the lack of them), than what are usually used for that purpose.

Being far more advanced (in terms of being self-aware and/or being able to develop and use technology) is far more likely, than that we’re the only one.

Anybody claiming to have some sort of authoritative answer for that question only shows, that meeting of _two_ _intelligent_ lifeforms could not be considered a certain event, even in the case if aliens were to come to Earth and talk to a human.

That’s even better than the calculations that show us that we’re only 15-20 years away from human-level AI. Every single year, for 50 years now.

A baby planet getting stripped naked forcibly by a perverted sun. And astronomers are taking photos of that. The Universe is nothing else than a gathering of sick pedos.