He lives in New Hampshire, no sales tax.

This is a really informative article.

That doesn't sound like something they would do.

Why not both?

I’m not sure the word borderline was needed there.

You’re assuming we didn’t. Those kind of activities don’t leave a genetic trail. It’s probably why the Jurassic Park velociraptors traveled in packs and actively took out humans.

Why not both?

Wait. Wait! WAIT!!!! Are you telling me that early humans were not always choosey about who they stuck their dicks into? 

This is such an easy problem to solve. Replace the recyclable symbol with flushable. Done and done.

I love the Mandalorian, but it does not work at all as a feature film, especially a Star Wars film. It doesn't say anything, and makes up the rules as it goes along.

Response from above.

Slighr conjectur, but... That will never be okay to put on any company’s network. (Nor something like donate to the United way) I’m sure she got approval somehow, but I doubt it was appropriate approval. When you work at an international corporation like that you need to know the difference. I have no doubt Google is…

She put unauthorized code on the company’s intranet? It’s early so maybe I misread, but of not nothing after this really matters.

“influencer"

I don’t think a plan like this “goes” awry. More like is awry.

In my own version Han and Leia never fell out. It was all trying to get Ben back. There were places/people that General Solo couldn’t go to/talk to, but Scumbag Smuggler Solo had access to the underbelly of the galaxy. It only works if nobody knew.

I seem compelled to say this ever Star Wars post, but I really wish people would take this viewpoint more often. Even if you think IV-VI were perfect (they’re not,but that’s besides the point). Compare the new movies to I-III. That's what Lucas was going to give us more of.

This. I will never disagree with somebody hating Google, but you can't ask them to filter out things like hateful or dodgy results, and then be surprised that it brings known quantities to the top.

Oh and to the first part, all search engines determine what we see. Google is tinkering more to get there's to see us exactly what they want us to see.

Your statement has just as much backing as mine. I don’t like most of what Amazon and WalMart are, but people use them because they want to. The third DDG (my primary search engine btw) is arguably not what a person using that search term wants.