it-has-a-super-flavor--it-is-super-calming
Franky drinks Darjeeling tea (made sense with the avatar gif)
it-has-a-super-flavor--it-is-super-calming

Binary is only 0 or 1.

As I’ve written elsewhere, inclusionary spaces are for all women: cis, trans and others, and are valuable resources for society. Rowling sees a need for cis-women only spaces, but rather than promote the benefits of having both she chooses to frame it as there being a problem with inclusionary spaces by citing the

No, inclusionary spaces doesn’t mean that. I didn’t say that. As I wrote before, they’re spaces for all women: cis, trans and others, and are valuable resources for society. Rowling sees a need for cis-women only spaces, but rather than promote the benefits of having both she chooses to frame it as there being a

Aww, the first single off the album isn’t “Party Monkey”?

You’re the one doing the name calling toward me.

Rowling knows what people think of her but rather than just be clear that she supports inclusionary spaces, which would be really easy for her to do, she’s done everything to make people think she doesn’t. If you don’t want to look like a bigot, then don’t behave like one, and maybe clarify how you’re not when

Then just say that and nothing else. Or when asked to clarify, do so in the ways I’ve already mentioned or risk being viewed as a bigot. As Rowling has. QED

Not talking about “live renditions”. There are plenty of albums recorded of orchestras playing film music (so that’s definitely under copyright), not live but studio recordings, which if you don’t know any better you’d think was from the original soundtrack. Some even market themselves as originals with similar album

even when their rights are actively being written out of legislation

I think it’s probably too late now. Rowling’s double-downed on her position for years, so yes she’d probably have to do more than just say I support inclusionary spaces”, but that was her opportunity to miss early on.

It should go without saying that I’m not responsible for Rowling’s reputation.

Hmmm, a grey that isn’t against human rights...

I’ve been perfectly clear about what Rowling’s done and hasn’t done.

Knowing that Lestat is coming back in season three (which will be adapted from the vamp’s rock-and-roll days in Anne Rice’s The Vampire Lestat as well as Rice’s The Queen Of The Damned), that might mean we may not immediately get answers as to what happens with Armand and Louis, but honestly, the thought of a

you want other people’s rights to single sex spaces taken away.

What fight? There’s obviously a difference between Rowling’s bigotry and anonymous defamation she’ll never see.

JK Rowling continues to be a tireless defender of women’s rights.

Learn the tolerance paradox to understand how ridiculous your twisted take is.

Obviously David Tennant is talking generally that trans rights are human rights. And Rowling then talks specifically citing a handful of examples to imply the general transphobic point that all trans people don’t deserve the same rights as everyone else.