The internet? That’s just humanity.

Huh? Teasers in the past have just been a dramatic reveal of the title/logo over some music.

Of course good music is still good at any volume. Unless you’re saying if it’s too quiet, or the screen too small, you can’t hear/see the details.

I’d take an AV article over “a couple celebs are in court over their winery”.

Maybe, though it was only a few years between cinema and TV viewings.

I once had the experience of finding out Titanic isn’t a good movie by seeing it on TV, after having enjoyed it in the cinema years before.

Counterpoint: a good movie works just as well on a small screen.

I’m not sure how the actual quality of the films fits into this.

I disagree, as I explain elsewhere here.

If we can have Puppet Master vs Demonic Toys, Aliens vs Predator, Freddy vs Jason, Sadako vs Kayako, and Godzilla vs Evangelion (as a ride),

I guess there are lots of different ways to interpret it.

It’s a teaser.

The mutilated strains of the Harry Belafonte classic, rendered appropriately joyless in the style of every Hollywood trailer of the last 15 years

This article is next to “rich people problems” in the dictionary.

I read that as she should have a lot of free hands, which I think was the problem in the first place.

Maybe some Gen Xers, but of course no generation is a monolith.

Said it before, will say it again: Ghostbusters 2016 was fine for the first half, but became a kids movie in the second half.

I remember the first movie being like a “greatest hits” of the first half of the book, and the book had a more whimsical tone though I thought the movie captured some of that, but they then added more of a pop/rock soundtrack for the international release which changed the vibe a bit (I have both soundtracks).

Just because you attempt something doesn’t mean you succeed.

At least you found a different photo without him making that pouty face.