Flagged for hate speech.

I like how you cut out all the relevant parts of the paragraphs you’ve quoted, where the authors of that page describe exactly how the U.S. court system has arrived at a current definition of “obscenity.” While the definition of what is included as obscenity is subject to evolution (hence why I’m suggesting hate…

The sheer lunacy of people in this thread is absolutely fucking insane. I wish you best of luck in this argument because people who either just don’t get it, or purposely choose not to get it for the sake of maintaining their severe psychosis, deserve to be confronted.

That’s why I left it to one line, idiot. So the whole thing would show up in your notifications.

Back to the dismiss button I see. Good riddance! I’ll remove this subthread too.

You sound like an old man ranting at a cloud.

Ha I don’t even know what you mean by “fencing” but I suspect it’s to refer to your inability to grapple with the fact that I am right about stating your inability to read my argument as it is laid out. Everything else you’ve written is utter bullshit stemming from your inability to comprehend.

No, the Supreme Court has ruled the opposite about sexual acts in public spaces. Private spaces are entirely different and no one in this entire thread is talking about punishing obscene speech in private spaces.

You seem to have misread me. Women are a protected class. Men are a protected class. Black people are a protected class. White people are a protected class. There are dozens of others. We may soon find gay people and trans people to also be protected classes.

I can see it’s hard for you to read, but I’ve already explained - thoroughly - why confronting Manny Both-Hanz’s submission to the status quo is an issue. I even stated the reason in my very first comment! If you care to know, you can go back and read it through the thread; it’s still visible.

I can own up to that. Apologies.

That’s right, it’s me who is brainless, rather than the spineless apologist who can’t be bothered to engage with thoughtful rebuttals of their shit opinions.

Obscene speech has severe restrictions placed upon it by the U.S. legal system.

‘Dismissed a logical comment I disagreed with. My idiocy.’

That’s because Ugh dismissed my comment, which eliminated anything in response to it.

I didn’t “censor” your response. It disappeared when Ugh dismissed the comment thread you replied to.

I’ll make this plain too. Ugh is a cowardly apologist whose only problem is that their head is so far up their own asshole that they cannot see the devastation going on around them, to the point where they think it is ok to hum along with the status quo.

No I didn’t admit that. I said MSU could take that very argument into court and win, thus preventing him from speaking.

Not really. I’ve already defined it narrowly enough to keep that from happening: speech that advocates for stripping away rights from protected classes of people is obscene and therefore not protected by the First Amendment.

Nope, the power in your hands is to not actively support obscene speech that calls for stripping rights away from others.