isgk
isgk
isgk

Yes BOTH sides, I mean seriously you can remember to 2017 can't you?  Where a radical leftist shot on a hill and started shooting at Repunlican Senators playing softball.

This comes as a result from the Supreme Court ruling in 2015 making gay marriage legal. The 2009 ruling only allowed *same sex* couples to be here on a visa, if you were an unmarried CIS couple you couldn’t be here on a visa. The basis for this difference was that gay marriage was not legally recognized by the US.

That’s not how math works... it’s €2 to install on one ship not all ships. You need to use the same base, either cost to install ALL ships and all fuel costs, or cost to install one ship and cost of one ship’s fuel. Assuming all things being equal, to install it on all 784x Maersk ships it would cost €1.586 billion,

All I know is that escalation hasn’t changed anyone’s mind. At best they agree with you out of fear, and like a pet who obey’s your command out of fear if you every show any weakness in your ability to induce fear in them they will reverse in on you and use fear to force your to agree at worst it will drive people

Exactly, the Germans conflated the power of the (very, very) few Jews who actually were wealthy and some privilege/prestige and then disparaged all groups. Arguing that a whole “white group” has power is the same tactic used by the Germans; i.e. tie the two together. Of course whites have majority power in the US, but

Sorry but there’s no need for that level of escalation, it brings nothing of value to the table and only closes people’s minds further.

Actually it started by saying that the Jews had the power and control, and they were the reason that German people were so poor so it was OK to treat them poorly. They were simply oppressing the oppressors, it wasn’t until later after that they changed from Jews have the power to they are animals. Which is why the

1: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

Well... when you used it before to describe someone as racist here before it most surely would.  So were you wrong before calling a person racist or wrong now?

No that is not the definition of racism.  As a child of an immigrant, who’s actually visited Buchenwald concentration camp, it’s really scary to see people try to redefine racism so that “their person” doesn’t fall under it.  

I’m sorry many of these aren’t responses to someone else in twitter, she was the one who started the posts.   She obviously is racist.

I don’t believe the printing specifically the lower receiver is what allows it to fire fully automatic, it’s the one part of a AR15 that is required to have markings on it. Those markings require background checks, etc before purchasing. Without those markings it’s considered basically just a piece of metal and

Well over two decades ago she admitted to being diagnosed bi-polar and multiple personality disorder

The part that was missing is this:

Lynching is already illegal in all 50 states in the US, this is pure and simply a public play for votes move that does nothing, but makes them “look good”.

Maybe in your liberal, urban bubble you should read some news, and really, really rethink as to why “this makes me so, so nervous”, because if you stepped out of your bubble you might actually be informed rather than scared of your shadow. You would see that the UNHRC has condemned Israel more than every other country

But if only the militia had them all the people who used them for food would be dead.

You made the claim they didn’t intend for people to have a gun, when it is more than obvious that in the 1700's during the revolutionary war they already had guns, not just for an army/militia but for food, etc. You are making the claim that they didn’t intend for people to have guns when it already was a way of life

Except none of those links show anything about having a gun. Sure they talk about a well regulated militia but it doesn’t backup your assumption at all. You are making a rather large leap of faith.

Umm pretty sure when it was written most households had guns for food, fighting against the British, or protection. They may not have intended everyone to have a fully automatic weapon (as it hadn’t been invented yet), but that’s a whole different thing than what you are saying.