I’m sorry but your story isn’t even remotely plausible... Bush Sr’s driver in the 80's would have been people in the secret service. And because it was during the cold war it wouldn’t have been just a single person protecting the Vice President it would have been a bunch of people. Vice President’s don’t goto their…

My S.O. this week just got a spinal cord stimulator permanentlt implanted that is attached to the spinal cord and “shocks” its wearer. But rather than torture it removes the constant pain they have.

Seriously nobody cared? You might want to update your search skills as it was repeatedly on Gawker sites, click on sny if those articles and look how much “nobody cared”

You might want to read the linked to list of guidance and see pretty much everything you say there ARE NOT removed... but don’t let reality get in the way of your outrage.

I think the reason why it’s considered an exhibition of depravity is that one person intentionally hung out in a bathroom to hit on strangers to have set there. Where it the situation you present with Harry Styles, it’s a bit different he wasn’t hanging out in the bathroom to hit on unknown woman; but more both…

Just to understand things.... an anti-Muslim ad is one that doesn’t mention anything about Muslims at all and explicitly uses the words terrorist. A video that lists 3x terrorist events, but doesn’t mention any names of the terrorists, doesn’t mention the religion of any of them, only one photo of the terrorists shows…

The problem I see is that the Orville is too heavy handed. The previous versions of Trek seemed to at least try to give the “other side” some thought. They actually tried to present both sides with some reason to allow the viewer to use their brain a bit and not just see the other side as “evil bad guys”.

He also probably had security clearance because AT&T provided secure telco service for the government. A telco CEO would have to have security clearance for budgetary planning purposes, let alone you get into connection points, specialized staff to run just that equipment, etc.

Yeah but if you were worth a million dollars would you risk things for a measly 1% bump?

And again not a single bit of proof to back up anything. It’s almost like you have nothing to stand on.... hmmmmm. I think it’s because you simply can’t provide any information at all that using a gun to shoot at something living and using a gun to shoot at something inanimate have been there from the very beginning…

Yup, further proof you have no facts to bring to the table. You’ve not been able to bring a single item of proof to your argument to even have a discussion about. But you are really good at looking like a person who CAN’T back up their statements.

Yeah because you CAN’T refute it, you’ve been unable to provide anything of any substance at all. You are unable to refute it, your position is as stable as quicksand. You are unable to admit to your failure and it’s obvious to all that you simply are unable to bring any actual factual information. I though that…

I think you answered your own question with your last sentence, filtered to bucket that nobody looks at.

Umm what you want to get into a semantics war about Chinese gunpowder used for celebrations, then used as rockets to set others aflame, etc? The first use of a gun (not a Chinese rocket, or a Mongul canon, etc but a gun) was used against an object to prove it worked. Your argument is basically that a gun’s only use is…

I’m thinking you don’t know what the definition is:

Would you be willing to make a monetary bet as to the number of times guns are used to kill things vs used in other ways on a daily basis? Actually ill handicap myself and give you a 25% head start. Willing to take that bet?

Well you can’t pick up a fully automatic firearm in the US... but somehow someone who wanted one was able to get one.

Umm... you must have really shitty memory and a complete idiot or very SELECTIVE memory to fit your argument which is even morally worse.

Well let’s look at the facts we know:

Weird things like that have happened before. The Russians actually used microwaves against the US Embassy to weaken the staff there; I have a copy of a letter from John Hopkins sent to my father (Marine embassy guard during the late 60's early 70's) talking about it and they were studying the effects.