ironicmind13
David Baker
ironicmind13

@ddrussianinja: shhh that's bringing perspective into the argument. That's not allowed

Considering most of the OS's were custom Roms, I fail to see the point of this chart. Most custom roms are based off of previously established code. That being said you either have AOSP, a modified manufacturer rom, or a combination of the two. You can't count 14 different versions of Froyo as fragmentation when

Android's fragmentation is just something Apple and Microsoft like to throw around for shock value. Yes there is a fragmentation, but its not really about home launchers. You can switch those all day long through the Market so that's really a bunch of horse crap. Yes it may be an issue, but at the same time isn't that

@Whitson Gordon: Why wouldn't you run Linux on an Alienware? That's like asking why you wouldn't want Linux on a PS3. Power, power, and more power

@jasam22: What's broken about it, or any Linux distribution for that matter? I have used a number of different distros (for fun) and I find them all to be stable with less setup required than a Windows system. I currently use Ubuntu on my desktop and Fedora on my laptop and have had no problems with them. Even

How is AT&T going to feel about people jumping ship to VZW? They may be a little butt-hurt by time this is said and done

@ShouldntHaveMessedWithJonStewa...

@yearofthe: Que 3 Episodes of constipated anger and PG trash talk

Anyone else wanna go work in Japan now?

@moonshadowkati: So they gave up an iPhone for an iPad? Those people aren't looking for an all in one device, they're looking for a fad. You're still going to need some sort of a phone if you have a tablet. A tablet just won't cut it for a mobile phone. So the only other option would be to have some sort of device

@moonshadowkati: While they're not connected yet, the iPad and iPhone would be prime examples of this and I don't see them going away just yet. The iPad also has a mouse and keyboard dock... So really they're only a step a way. Well a step and four more generations of what they have now.

@walkingagh: I agree. This would be a great piece(s) of technology if it actually takes off. Maybe other companies will start mimicking them.

@grigori: If they didn't have the balls to compete in the first place, why waste money making a phone. There's no reason why they can't take a chance. The money was already invested, why throw it way. Considering the fact that Google took exactly that risk and are now one of those big boys you mentioned. Granted they

This is highly possible. As it is the current models only work with one aspect of the physical world. Hence the reason we have astro-physics and quantum physics. What applies to the large doesn't necessarily apply to the minuscule particles. So it seems that there could be other factors throughout the universe that

Now the JFK ice bullet conspiracies can finally be proven!

Are those really the two paths they are choosing between? Keep releasing crap or quit. I think their R&D Dept. needs some cleaning out. No one thought to use better hardware?

@tundraboy: the glasses got more futuristic, but with the same great headaches and eye strain. And it still discriminates against people who wear glasses. We're gonna see prescription 3D glasses if this keeps up. *facepalm*

@A Ferret AKA A Polecat: I don't have a problem with standard definition as I tend to still watch a few non HD channels, but the quality is very apparent. It's like the difference between VHS and DVD. While they both have the same content, one is obviously better than the other.

@OCEntertainment: When the price tag is an extra $1000 for the tv, the cost of half of another tv, then 3d is not a "feature". You can't compare that to PIP. PIP is a feature that is aimed towards sports enthusiasts and is rarely touted as an amazing piece of technology these days. While 3D can be easily converted to