I honestly can’t believe I have two people who are basically saying “why comment?” I don’t know hoss - why blog? Why Internet? Why communication?

Phew, thank god. my personal code of honor requires that I had to watch the games against my will until I got permission to stop from a random stranger on the Internet.

Love watching women’s soccer, can get into televised softball and gymnastics, enjoys watching women who are world class athletes like Williams sisters, but women’s basketball is a TV nightmare. HOT TAEK I know...

Also FYI: If you wikipedia leggings, literally the first sentence says they are for both men and women.

Still though, if we put aside whether or not Kevin Draper looks favorably on this - how exactly is this screwing up that bad thing? You really think that some applications from benchwarmers and walk-ons are going to overwhelm the committee who reviews them? What does it take, 60 seconds to throw those ones in the “no”…

But you still haven’t explained why Cal’s action screw up the system that the NCAA had in place. What is bad about all the players declaring and getting information, even in the eyes of the NCAA? I don’t get it.

Sorry Draper but this was confusing for me as well. The sarcasm or context you tried to put it in didn’t come through and it sounds like you are trying to put down Calipari’s move here.

I think that’s where the disconnect lies for me. Deadspin clearly hates the amateur bullshit the NCAA tries to pull... and this is the correct opinion! However, as you admit, Calipari really lays that system bare, while giving the kids that play for him the best deal possible in the shitty system the NCAA forces on…

That sounds like you are implying he is doing something wrong to me, causing a problem.

I’m confused. What is John Calipari screwing up? I mean, it’s kind of dumb his freaking walk ons will be putting their name in for the draft, since that seems like a waste of the time it takes to do so....but who exactly does this bother?

I truly want to hate Calipari, I really do. But then I hear pompous fucktards like Coach K, Williams, and Boeheim spewing their bullshit and I don’t.

CDC did in fact report that children who grow up in violent neighborhoods suffer trauma (though some media outlets saddled it with the unhelpful “Hood Disease” tag ), so Glazer isn’t wrong that many NFL players probably do go into the sport suffering from mental disorders.

I just know this was written by a feminist who made up her mind about this kid before she even read the article. Disgusting

There are many court cases (Papelino v. Albany College of Pharmacy being one) where the plaintiff has won for being expelled without proof of a breach of schools rules conduct. Schools either private or public are in a quasi contract. The plaintiff has a real case in future lost wages, soiled reputation and even more.…

For Yale, as a private university, it’s not necessarily of whether they owe you “good” or “decent” procedure, it’s whether or not they followed the procedures that they adopted.

I know all men are guilty until proven innocent on this topic at this website, but this seems really fucking fishy. I know the standards for a university hearing are probably lower, but this isn’t anywhere near “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

That’s not what the lawyer is saying. He is saying that, on the 4th episode, they had sex, went their separate ways and later “re-connected” and the woman slept with the man. He is asking why a woman who was raped would reach out to the rapist for a sleeping companion.

I think the lawyer means that he was never legally accused of rape and the was never accused publicly by the woman.

who hurt you?

I disavow this take.