If you think this is a man “telling a woman what to do with her body”, you clearly have a blurred notion between the concepts of telling and suggesting.

If I say “Hey, I invented this new workout machine for women.” and you said “Don’t tell me what to do with my body.” you’d be crazy. If his idea is bad, that’s fine,…

There’s a billion dollar industry around solving the problem of, (not necessarily having a period), but of the menses. So yes, I think there’s something there.

He can’t even have read the Bible, since there’s definitely a fair amount fussing in the Old Testament about how menstruating women are unclean and having sex with a menstruating woman is a terrible sin which renders you unclean, too. (I never thought I’d be citing the Old Testament as a comparatively accurate source…

Here’s the thing.. You sound like a sexist moron who things men can’t comment or innovate or work in women’s issues because they don’t have a vagina, and therefore women somehow shouldn’t either. Why don’t you argue the points on their fucking merits and not attack the people who are trying, because of their…

The Human Ouroboros Centipede

Then why aren’t we reading historical jokes about women being glued to their skirts or benches or the ground or something?

Exactly. If you took a lot of these comments on their face, men shouldn’t bother to work on bra design, or women’s fashion, or market to women, or be gyno’s or OBGYN’s. The subjects idea was bad because of his gender, not because of the idea.

This isn’t about that. This is a guy inventing something to solve a problem, namely, allowing women to choose when and where they want to discharge.

A lot of people are saying “Stay out of women’s issues” in response. I don’t see why the gender of the person who invented or proposed this should have any bearing on the…

Is that how equality works? It’s a historical net?

Besides if my body confuses you so damn much why do you want to fuck me so bad anyway? If a vagina is a scary mystery to you then don’t try to put anything of yours in one.

I wasn’t trying to give this particular guy even a slightest endorsement; he doesn’t seem qualified to even practice general medicine. But medical research in general doesn’t, or at least shouldn’t, know gender boundaries. Men can study menstruation, women can study prostrate cancer, and so on. The most important part…

“A bit” anti-modern medicine? You DO know that chiropractors are, in no sense, “modern medicine”. They are 100% alternative voodoo bull%^&. There have been repeated studies proving (1) chiropracty is not effective, and (2) chiropracty is not safe.

Well, have you tried eating a baby? Maybe it could help with your back pain?

There certainly seems to be a healthy dose of sexism involved.

Many fathers tend to be involved in their children’s lives. Or would you prefer he just say “ew icky” and never talk to her about boys and bodies and stuff?

If thats the case, women. Please stay out of men’s issues. Ever. Or does that only apply one way?

Breast reduction surgery for upper back, neck, and shoulder pain from having large, heavy breasts has the highest patient satisfaction rate of any form of plastic surgery, and among the highest patient satisfaction rates of any kind of voluntary surgery. As soon you have insurance and can take time off from work, you…

I’m pretty sure it’s a play on “menses,” i.e. your period.

Men, if they are actually professional researchers in the field, can certainly contribute to the gynecological research just fine. This guy absolutely doesn’t qualify; his inability to understand a basic concept like how infections happen pretty much disqualifies him from any meaningful medical title.

Actual quote of him arguing with someone who told him this idea was dumb: