No she did not. They knew a black man was at the apartment based on hair fibres. They found pictures of Lumumba on Amanda's phone, as he was her boss. They continually asked her if he was the killer and asked her to imagine a scenario in which he could have killed Amanda.

She didn't lie, she was asked to imagine if he had done it by the police. Completely different.

She did not outright lie. Read the facts of the case. She was given this name by the police!!!!

She did not actually accuse Lumumba. This is actually quite strange, because the "document" they have where they state she accuses Lumumba, is also the same document they claim is her confession.

She didn't do cartwheels. It was just yoga stretching during the interrogation.

Well, except the judge actually stating that people wanted her in jail because she was American: [blog.seattlepi.com]

She was found not guilty. 50% of criminal cases are overturned or result in reduced sentences on appeal. She is innocent.

They had no evidence to show that Knox and Sollecito were at the crime scene, and yet they were intent on keeping them in jail for the murder of their daughter. Losing a daughter does not mean that you get free reign to put innocent people in jail.

DId you know that the Kercher family stood to gain $36 million in a civil action if Sollecito and Knox were found guilty? Did you know that they did not take such action against Guede, because he had no money?

I will say that I actually do not sympathize with the Kercher family at this point. They lost their daughter, and that is terrible, but they railroaded an innocent person, and there is a lot of evidence to show they did so for financial gain.

I wouldn't say that is the best response. Teach her what can happen, but honestly, she shouldn't be punished for disgusting men violating her privacy. Frequently, she can't really do anything about it, as it would be teen boys her age saving the pictures off of her Facebook.

Alright - those who are saying she is automatically guilty, should read the facts of the case. There is absolutely zero DNA evidence that puts her in the bedroom. Firstly, if this was a sex game gone awry, like the prosecutors suspect, that would be absolutely impossible. Secondly, the ONLY DNA in the room, aside from…

I think there are a few things missing from this article, and that some of the outrage is a bit misplaced.

I guess my porn name would be Grunchie Village. Unless we wanted to go by her full name and then it would be: Grunchie the Leftover Puppy Dog III Village.

Well of course. It is HER fault she wasn't born a man, isn't it?

Anyone else see a different correlation here? If the husband is jealous of the relationship with the male friend...and he also has problems with impotence... could it be that the erectile dysfunction is the result of the wife not being a man?

Meh, I can say that a big part of my ED was seeing pictures of models and thinking that was the ideal form of beauty. Being fearful of becoming a woman was pretty integral to that, as I thought that the transition would change my body from the ideal. I have fairly good memories of being young and thinking this, so I…

And then the cat declared, "I don't care if I only represent 1/5 of this family and am therefore a minority, I'm going to run this house!"

How did a man make this though? How would he have any idea what menstruation feels like? These kind of stunts always kind of bother me.

Why does my boyfriend consider doing the groceries a favour to me? Even when he benefits from it as well?