inzoum
Inzoum
inzoum

Yeah, that's what I managed to see. Sideways picture doesn't help :/

Touché.

I'm sorry but I just can't play this and not feel like I'm cheating on Wipeout. Just look at the ship design. It's like asking a hooker to put on a wig and makeup and pretend it's your ex, you're just certain to get a dirty dirty shameful feeling afterwards...

did you really need me to put a "/sarcasm" in my comment?

If you stick your hand out the window of a moving vehicle and get it ripped off, uuuh, I guess you're also an idiot.

"Hold your Wee for a Wii contest"? Wow... That's probably just as stupid as Who Poop Last:

BAM! Talk about appropriate.

Well, that guy is right about one thing: no one in that video got hurt.

I thought it was a little too bland, I was hoping for something a little more tongue-in-cheek, something that would end up surprising me once in a while, in the end it's really just exploration and classic zelda dungeoning with nothing really surprising or innovating asides from the art style.... much less "funny"

3D dot game heroes was a big disappointment for me. I hope this game's - you know - good.

7-8% is a horrible number, but it all depends on the nature of the defect. If it's a dead pixel, I'd say "meh, whatever", if the thing crashes constantly or fails to boot for 7% of the devices, that's a serious issue

They're not, they released these works into public domain before they had the right to (international copyright laws still had some time left protecting these works), that's just wrong. They're rightfully rolling back on that decision in accordance with international copyright laws.

I think you fail to understand that they're essentially undoing a premature release in public domain on SOME works with regards to international copyright laws, not giving themselves the right to own stuff that belongs to everyone. They will eventually fall into public domain again when their time is due for real

The author was talking about the iPad3's resolution being 260ppi, assuming a 2048x1536 screen of the same size as the iPad2, as opposed to the iPhone's 326ppi. That being said, the increased viewing distance will make this lower resolution sufficient for natural viewing.

The proper thing to do would have been to not release these under public domain in the US when these titles are still covered by copyright laws in other countries. The fact that they did means that anyone wishing to reproduce these works can do it free of charge if they do it in the US, meaning that copyright owners

I'm kind of torn between two thoughts here...

Well... it does kind of sound like some sort of "Pokémon Tactics" to me... but, uuh, what's Nobunaga doing in Pokémon?

overall it adds network load because managing so many connections with so many different users will add to the overhead on top of the actual data transfered. The main advantage is that the transfer is spread out in smaller pieces over multiple low/mid-bandwidth routes and doesn't hammer a single server with a

The thing with streams is that they'll store a buffer so that playback doesn't skip due to fluctuations in transfer speeds. Most of the time, that usually means "the whole damn file is in your browser's cache folder by the time you're done watching it, ripe for picking". It's not impossible to grab a streamed file and

Great, so if you watch a video on YouTube that's about to be removed on grounds of copyright infringement, you're also exposing yourself to being sued for having actively shared that content yourself.