It was very clear. It said what it was. Feeling entitled that you should get content that was created a year and a half to two years after you bought that season pass is ridiculous. It defined what you were buying and it was a good deal and still is a good deal for what you get. Gearbox came through with some…

Did you ever think that when the Season Pass was originally released they didn't know whether they would be releasing more than the 4 DLC originally promised in the Season Pass. Often times decisions about whether to make additional content are based on the reception and success of the content released before it. 4…

I think I'm anooyed because I've finally seen a developer take the word "Season" literally with the Season Pass idea and take what should have been a promise of getting all the DLC that comes for a certain preset price and instead used it as a limit to when they'll ask for more money.

They actually stated that you'll be getting 4 DLC for the price of 3. It was stated on PSN store at least (I bought mine on steam sales) as I remember and all gaming media said it was 4 DLC. "More crap" probably came up after the success of the DLC sales-wise, personally i'm burn-out already after Tiny Tina's but hey…

I don't see the problem, it's clearly stated that you'll be getting 4 DLC on the pass and you're getting $45 content for $30 (and great content imo except Big Hunt). I got mine during steam sales at $10 though :) BL 2 is full game in itself and each dlc is worth $10 imo so it's worth it, but hey you can always wait…

Because it is the name of the product which is misleading.

.....and this is why seasons passes are such a terrible idea in video games.

EA tried that, remember Kingdoms of Amalur? It was announced a week before launch that the game on disc was missing content, but was available for "free to new purchases" from EA's server in order to even start. They said it would be helpful in making a profit from used players, because if you bought the game anywhere…

Hey, you tell me. Is there any recognized standard for what a "season" means in terms of video game DLC? It apparently means whatever the company wants it to mean, and for that reason they have a responsibility to be very clear about defining what it means for THIS game.

They did say so.

I think that you're both right, to an extent.

Seriously. If they'd made it clear when you bought the season pass that you'd have to buy more crap later, that'd be fine, but the whole point is that you pay extra up front trusting that you'll get all the DLC and that the DLC will be worth getting.

If they had a different model in mind, they should've said so.

If BL2 offered something new than just "new quests, more loot and lvl increase" maybe I would fork the money for the DLC packs.

Its a great game like its predecessor, but like World of WarCraft its just more of the same.

How about throwing in some PC mods into the console packs? that would be nice to see.

These Half Life 3 confirmed "jokes" seriously need to stop. They weren't funny 3 years ago, they aren't funny now. They are just stupid.

I'll say it. This song blows. It always has. I now hate it with every fiber of my being, and I hate that smiling, shouting retards make me almost feel guilty over being a curmudgeon. My sound distaste of a shitty song should be able to be open and shameless, without me feeling like I just went on an angry tirade while…

With all the walking he's done in the past 5 years, you'd think he'd have lost a bit of weight.

Ill give home 10. Done before Christmas next year

I'll take the under.