incognito253
Believelander
incognito253

“MEDIC!!!”

It’s mostly luck, my friend, but /hat tip

During Game 3 after Mozgov threw a pass out of bounds, LeBron dug into him in a way I’ve never really seen LeBron bark at his own teammates before. I’d be frustrated too; the healthy Cavs were nearly unstoppable.

100% chance his secret motivation is that Steph Curry is secretly Delonte West

He actually wrote a great piece last night about how the Cavs are dominating this series and referred to it as ‘great’.

Fair enough.

The numbers chosen made it look conspicuously like the “KYRIE SCRUBBING” hot taekz going on on the internet right now.

The analogy that Delly is a ‘2’ and Irving is a ‘1’ is inaccurate, though. Irving is far, far better than Dellavedova. In fact, if he had been 100% healthy, he would have been a better choice even from a matchup perspective. But yes, Delly is a better matchup choice than a badly hobbled Irving was even before he broke

Except he’s basically arguing that 2+2=4, but 2+3 < 4, which is incorrect. It is conceivable that the matchup without Kyrie is helping the Cavs, but the team is not *better* for Love and Irving being injured.

So basically what your comment boils down to is that you have no transgender loved ones.

Giving who the award? The most recent recipient would be a ‘her’, so it’s not clear who you are referring to.

Good thing it’s an award for courage, not sports relevance.

Or Muhammed Ali...in 1997.

....what the fuck even?

Actually, if you weren’t a bigot and actually read a fucking book instead of eating reprocessed ignorance out of your fellow bigots’ assholes, you would understand that the medical consensus on transgender people of people who actually know what they are talking about (a.k.a. NOT YOU) states that Caitlyn Jenner made a

Reasons this post fails, ranked:

Since when does an award with someone’s name on it equate the recipient’s actions with that of the person the award is named in the honor of? Seems awfully like an unintentional straw man argument; you are arguing against an equating that isn’t being made.