It's the internet I can judge away. Seeing as how these women are in a position where it is easier to come forward than in the usual case (seeing as how they *know* there are multiple victims, they prob all *know* each other and *know* multiple women already reported to management), you are damn right I am going to…

The ratings were dismal, so maybe they didn't bother. The show was probably losing money every time it aired. It's sad, but also not unexpected, I like the guy, but the panel segment which was over half of the show was almost always a waste of time…

I stand corrected!

Supposedly, and I did not look to confirm this, it had to do with contracts. Apparently now was the time to decide to keep the show going with another round of contracts.

I watched 30 episodes near the start, hoping they would ditch the panel and they never did…

YES! AGREED! The Panel, half the show basically every night, was a terrible waste of time 99% of the time.

The main problem with Wilmore's show is that the Panel segment was almost never worth watching. Which is bad because that was half his show every night.

Listen, I barely even watch the Daily Show anymore. But I did give Wilmore's show a chance. I watched probably 30 episodes within the first three months of him starting.

Listen, I know it sucks. Never happened to me personally, but I have read and directly heard enough about it. But my point is, as bad as it is, it needs to be done, otherwise serial sexual assaulters are let off the hook. I'm stubborn like that. However I can see in some cases where the cons of coming forward…

That's two people now who say I am pro-rapist for encouraging women to get rapists charged with actual crimes. You people have the shittiest reading comprehension abilities imaginable. So long crooked paul.

Dude, you are obsessed. And also a lying piece of shit. Do you even remember what strawmen I called you out on? You claimed that *I* claimed that their case would easily sail through the courts with a conviction. That of course is horseshit. So much so that when you rebutted my comment regarding that you…

I wonder if you, like this moron I was talking to last night, will claim I EMBOLDEN RAPISTS, even though I am arguing women should go to the police in order to get rapists charged with crimes.

You are a failure.

Almost the opposite end of the contunuum, *not including direct evidence* (ie witnesses or camera footage), which I stated. Which you dishonestly left out, because you are a piece of shit.

Lol, forgot to add, you claim I am emboldening rapists by encouraging women to go to the police so that criminal charges can be brought against rapists. ROFLOL.

Wow, it's like you are too stupid to even remotely comprehend what I said AND you are so muddled you would have the audacity to even remotely imply that I embolden rapists? WTF!? Are you drunk right now? Read my post right before the short one where I called you terrible. Read is slowly, while sober. THEN and…

Terrible rebuttal dude. Terrible. Also, my name says "genuis" not genius. Way to further show that you do not read carefully!

Your head is nude even when you are wearing clothes.

Ha ha ha, awesome!

Oh shiiiiit. You aren't very bright. Damn, I am sorry, I thought you were just trolling me all this time. Have you ever heard of the concept of "failure to warn"? Doubtful based on your behavior here. Anyway *that* would be my complaint to the women, as I have been describing, if they do not ever go to the police…