Yep. Yep, you are definitely the single dumbest mother ducked I have ever seen comment on this website. Aggressively, almost impressively, stupid. Holy fuck, are you stupid.

No, it doesnt. Holy shit, are you stupid. You’re obviously a MacGregor fanboy, but face reality, moron: MacGregor was never, at any point, even a slight threat to Mayweather. The fact that MacGregor won a round doesn’t mean anything at all. Mayweather, who even in the early rounds basically just walked through…

Just wait until they find out they’re really not getting that wall.

They REALLY wanted the white racist to knock out the black woman beater. Unfortunately, wishing a thing does not make it so.

Have some warm milk and go to bed, little guy. You’re clearly overtired and grumpy that your rampant ignorance has been called out by, what, everyone?

That’s because I was pretty sure anything original would go right over your head, like this fight did.

That’s a lot of words to say “I don’t know shit about shit.”

That’s funny. I was gonna ask you the same thing.

So, the answer is that you can’t link any of those articles, and Deadspin is literally the only sports analysis you read? You could say that in a lot fewer, more direct words.

It’s almost like you don’t understand what you wrote in the initial comment. If you just wanted to argue that Deadspin had said it would be a quick fight, you would be correct. But you also tried to claim that this article claimed the fight was predictable, which it didn’t.

You wanna link any of these “dozens” of articles you read? Experienced analysts said 8-10. Anybody saying 1-2 was a hype machine that either didn’t know what they were talking about or was invested in the hype. It’s clear you can’t tell the difference.

Do you mean the comment that shows that you didn’t comprehend what Patrick wrote in this article?

You clearly stated you only read Deadspin’s predictions, so maybe try actually reading anything else before you keep being so aggressively stupid.

Sure. But you said the fight was not as “predictable” as they claimed. And I am pointing out that they are not saying the fight was as predictable as they claimed. Just the ending was. And they even acknowledged that they fight was not as predictable as they had claimed in the second half of the sentence you…

I don’t think you realize who you are talking about. Mayweather isn’t that kind of fighter, and never was. This was exactly the kind of victory anyone who knows anything about boxing was predicting.

Mac won the first 2 because Floyd let him, so that he’d gas himself and show everything he had. Floyd maybe threw 10 punches combined in those rounds. Conor didn’t win a round after that, but I’d be fascinated to know which ones you think he did.

Boxing, as a sport, hasn’t had any dignity for about 40 years. It barely had any before that.

After 49 fights of pretty much giving up the first 2 rounds is it really all that surprising of a start? Floyd sacrifices early to run them down and picks apart tired bodies, it’s been the same fight plan for a decade now.

Nope. 7-2, and he spotted Mac the 2.

Conor put on a show but it was clear as day that Floyd was in control the whole time. Even in the beginning other than the uppercut, not much landed at all and Conor punched himself out. Surprisingly good fight I guess.