And I’m sure that his firm put no pressure on him in any way, and that pressure (or persuasion) never made its way to his wife in any way.

I can tell how reasonable or unreasonable your comments are. I didn’t make a statement about your reasonability, I made a statement about mine. I did however, imply that you’re unreasonable, and here is why:

In your case? No, it’s not hard at all. You’re politically biased and judging politicians based on their public statements in a way that reflects your own political views.

I assume you’re a licensed psychologist who has examined them both in person? You must pull a lot of water to have that kind of access.

You seem to not remember Clinton’s record, or how it compares to her current statements, or the paths that she had recommended in the past. It’s convenient how the person that matches our voter registration never seems as bad. Most voters just don’t vet them as much.

Because what he said was inherently valid. There are reasons to question Hillary’s competency / mental illness. She’s seemingly very forgetful and has some issues distinguishing reality. We, as liberals, dismiss these as “political expediencies” when she does it. That was what the comment you replied to was pointing…

I’m a man, who didn’t want to have sex with a woman... I said no, and she pressured me into it. This has happened multiple times. Once it was a “no”, and she just went ahead. With another woman it was a “no” that she turned into a “fine, whatever” with her persistence.

Neither do you.

It would accelerate the same.

It would be an interesting comparison... I would think that with the right driver, the Ariel would win out.

Die Hard in Russia: Just another slow Tuesday.

I think we’re talking about different kinds of vacuums.

You should Add the Ariel Atom 500 to the Hardigree line.

It’s almost like the 1985 Chevette was created in a vacuum.

Solution:

This list should make the list for next year.

Let me break down your dickishness:

[This is not true at all. And he didn’t fix anything]

And my point, was that there are a ton of nut huggers praising this kid for his “engineering prowess” or “fixing ability”. He didn’t fix anything. He disassembled something and put it in a box. And my criticism here is of people praising his engineering spirit.

Actually, your statement was about his likelihood of getting into MIT.