That’s not what it says. It says you cannot imprison someone without due process.

How did they “clearly” go to far? You’re claiming knowledge of this woman’s state of mind, knowledge of the questions being asked, and knowledge of how they were being asked.

First: they don’t specify if it was during prosecution or defense that she broke down. Second: It’s not up to you how they question her. They should be allowed to challenge her version of events which is bound to be confrontational.

Because it’s guaranteed by the constitution that a defendant has the right to confront their accuser. Does that justify what they did? No... But the defense has to be allowed to question the witness.

It’s not that it was fast... It’s that it was so much faster than it’s contemporaries. The McLaren came out in 1993... so it’s “Road Car” competitors were the F50 and XJ220. It wasn’t till Porsche and Mercedes started slapping VIN numbers on the GT1 and CLKGTR that it had equals in street cars.

What? No “Captain Slow-hand” jokes?

Touche, whitey. Touche.

I’m not sure about that... Honestly, her toughness and aggression and willingness to kick ass are some of Hillary’s strong points.

Hillary is already smart and vicious. A VP does not need to be funny. See also: Joe Biden. (He’s not intentionally funny)

I’m (reluctantly) with her.

It’s learning from its older brother “Mustang”.

Yeah, but because of how cameras in phones work, you’d get a quality downgrade if you did that because you’d have to crop a bunch of pixels.

The second amendment is a civil right. Just so you’re aware.

“Your platform lost”

Bill is quite intelligent. You don’t get forgiven for transgressions by millions of people with an Erkel like “Oops... Did I do that? Was that wrong?” without a great deal of ability.

The country was founded on a dedication to justice, rights, and procedure that both sides have forgotten.

I miss the time when John McCain supported campaign finance reform and was buddies with Joe Lieberman.

Bill Clinton is no dummy.

It’s not about her running her own IT. It’s about the fact that for “convenience” she violated policy intended to protect the integrity of data. It may not have been any more or less secure than a government run server, but she chose a path where she or her proxies controlled the integrity of the data... Whereas on a…

What’s messed up is that the people who are decrying this lack of prosecution are the same people silent on the lack of prosecution on police killings. And the people celebrating this are the same people decrying the lack of prosecutions against police.