I’m sorry, where is that proven? They say some bystanders claim there were guns, the article from The Hill has bystanders saying there weren’t. And the driver said it was the ones banging on his truck that were threatening him with guns.

You were very quick to claim them to be protesters, but now that you’re making them thugs they have to be separate because that would make you racist.

So wait, you’re going to come back, when I have provided an article with other reports that the story of there being weapons to be false, that “its not a stretch to assume the driver is telling the truth”? Even if we excuse the fact that it then is also not a stretch to assume he’s lying, your evidence is to go into a…

Is what so?
Neither of those prove the story of the FedEx driver that they were armed or threatened him. One of your links isn’t even in St. Louis.

Or just present day Williamsburg

Oh wow, so they blocked a stationary vehicle and threw traffic cones and what looks like garbage at it? What a threat they posed, what an attack on police. I’ve hit bigger things while driving and never felt attacked or my life at risk.

Sorry, what other information? Did you even read my post or the article before responding? To quote myself:

Look, Autopilot fucked up, but the airbags not deploying are the bigger issue. Because this person not using the breaks at all is the other issue. Its not a self driving car and it doesn’t lock the breaks when autopilot is engaged.

Yes it is. And they conspicuously lack all the extra reports and information from The Hill. Its interesting I provide a source with a lot of information and you keep doubling down on ones with limited perspectives and information. Maybe open your mind a little to that.

Ahh yes, The Daily Mail, the most reliable source. /S

Actually they canceled it because of safety concerns for protesters. Very little got fucked up in Austin on Saturday past one car fire.

Blocking a roadway doesn’t? It got you to notice them and pay attention.

Police are denying the connection, but it looks like a cop is the cause of the Auto Zone being broken into and the start of the violence. But sure, its the protesters

He is suspected of forgery it hasn’t been proven. Last time I checked though, a felony isn’t a violent crime, and yet he was treated like a violent offender AND CHOKED TO DEATH WITH 3 OTHER OFFICERS STOOD AROUND AND WATCHED.

Sources needed. I’ve seen more evidence of police attacking these protesters and any violence against the police being in defense/retaliation. And either way none of these attacks have been with a weapon like A FULL SIZED MOTORIZED VEHICLE but maybe I’m just naive to call that an absurdly unnecessary use of force.

Soooo ... maybe don’t put yourself and 50 of your angry friends in front of the three-ton vehicle and dare the potentially jittery driver to run you over?

Sources needed.

Not seen any protesters surrounding innocent people and attacking them. I’ve seen more defense of innocent people, including separated police officers. I also have seen a lot of the arson and theft being able to be traced back to people not actually part of the protest trying to instigate.

Burnt out cop cars aren’t violence against people. They are destroyed property, specifically property that directly is a symbol of the violent oppression being protested. A symbol of the group mowing down peaceful protesters with cars. The group committing the unprovoked firing of rubber bullets and tear gas at…

Where are they attacking these people that are running people over? Blocking the street is one thing, but its not like these protests are a surprise, its been known that they are happening in these areas of these cities. These people are deciding to take their car there, then deciding to run people over. If they’re…

Show me them just straight up attacking cops. I’ll wait. Because any case of that I’ve seen have been after police instigated it with tear gas and rubber bullets fired without justification.