He got around to killing a whole lot of people though!

(It’s really not, but you know all the leftist halfwits that comment on this site will proclaim it to be true.)

Only if he’d done nothing. But the US is and has been for the last 4-5 decades actively instigating conflicts all over the world for political and economic interests. Its president is the last man in the world who should be getting a peace prize that’s worth anything.

Since Obama got one for doing nothing....

3. Do absolutely nothing (2009 recipient)

Other Nobel Prizes mean something.

Some facts for those that are unaware of kitesurfing stuff:

So it’ll be like every other day in Haiti?

Because she practiced Natalie’s smirk in the mirror. heh.

Hell, that was happening in the early 60's. And probably quite a bit before then. That’s no new thing. What was new was Congress deciding in the 90's that it was a rightful area of concern for them.

This is a great point. If nothing else, Trump is a paragon of marital virtue.

So here’s my understanding of this bizarre article - once again Gizmodo in the tank for Clinton (or at least so anti-Trump that the science part of this publication has flown out the window).

SourceFed’s findings were as close to a “double blind” type study as one could produce, thoroughly explaining in vivid detail…

He did it early on, much like Kevin Smith sits on a huge podcast empire either

Apparently he at least has the cash to hire folks to shill for him online still, so all must be good!

doesn’t it seem lucrative on the surface though?

So it is like radio (when radio was big) with a more easily defined market. You sell ad-time and sponsorship. Marketers buy ads based on the number of ears on the pod.

Those people are doing it wrong.