The people they work for - some scientists, some not - do the majority of the “,aking up” the scientists are getting paid a lot of money to do research on very narrow topics, present their findings and keep their mouths shut if they don’t agree with the inflated conclusions that are made about their work.

1) sarcasm

You should be embarrased - to speak or write such ignorance.

Not only was this predictable - it was actually...predicted.

Oh you got me.

Yes, but you know the reason we are overfishing don’t you?

Maybe THIS is what is affecting Hillary so much?!?

Payne, who has studied the End Permian extinction event that wiped out more than 95 percent of all marine species 250 million years ago, soon realized that his dataset—which included living and extinct members of nearly 2500 marine genera—could serve another purpose.

You did. Nothing has changed at all but you are looking at this wrong:

We know why her role was reduced and she got kicked to the curb/shot...

Seems pretty distracting to have the sign exhibiting so much motion in the graphics!

ha!

They need to do all the launches from Wallops from now on...

To all those who responded to my questions thanks!

So 168 years old or 203?

or always this correct?

Who cares about the worst thing you can do to a writer - that is the writer’s issue to deal with.

No. This is pretty cathartic.

But since “if” is not the case....

You just typed “gawker” & “journalists” in the same sentence.