idran--disqus
Idran
idran--disqus

Pretty much, doing stuff like that helps to confuse the automated detection on Youtube. It's why you'll also see clips uploaded with a border image around them.

They both did, didn't they? I thought it was like a Bashir/Garak thing where both actors saw it and left subtext in towards it.

Nah, it just means "I support there being a romantic relationship between these two fictional characters". You can ship canon just fine.

I'm more up on Golden from what I have read from her, myself - I've never read her Warcraft stuff which I'm pretty sure is her main thing now, but I loved her Ravenloft books, they were my favorites out of that line. But her Voyager stuff just left me utterly cold.

Oh yeah, it definitely does. I kind of get what you mean - the Martin/Mangels dual act has a certain feel to it that clashes with a lot of people - but the series does really well moving beyond Taking Wing. The Red King is neat, though you might want to skip ahead to Orion's Hounds; it's an amazing work based around

The Titan line'll also lead you into the Destiny trilogy, which is a great jumping-on point for the overall Trek Litverse if it ends up hooking you.

There's about a half-dozen devoted specifically to Titan, but about as many that also weave in and out of some of the other ongoing storylines in the novel line as well - they've been doing a lot to try and keep a general cohesive universe moving forwards. And yeah, they're really great; some people like some

Isn't that basically what Bioware is going to do with it in the next installment? Keep the Reaper story wrapped up and just tell a new story in the same setting?

Sorry, weirdly-phrased; I meant both in the book line. Titan's the novel series devoted to Riker in command of the USS Titan; most of the series to this point was about the Titan heading deep into the Beta Quadrant and seeing what all is there.

All other recent movie outings. If you want to see some exploring of strange new worlds, check into Titan or the Voyager relaunch in the book line.

Eh, you're probably right, yeah, and the idea of Fuller doing Trek as a general concept has me excited.

I'm still wary about the TV relaunch; I just hope it ends up not getting in the way of the book line. Treklit has been the best thing in Trek ever since the end of DS9, and if I had to choose I'd take the post-DS9 book line over the entire TV and movie run; the Destiny trilogy alone was better than any single episode

That only works if Alex Trebek says it

But they needed to choose two of the three tied contestants, not one of the three.

It's an idiom. If someone says "break a leg", you don't talk about how technically that's a threat rather than a wish for luck, and if someone says they're under the weather, you don't talk about how technically everyone is under the weather because the weather is in the sky. So why insist that this idiom be

There was recently a Power Ranger series where they turned into past Rangers from all the previous shows, so that probably brought a lot of that back around.

Ernie Anderson.

That's counting "A and B westerns, western shorts, and western-themed serials", though, not just feature films. I mean, your overall point stands - there were a ton of Westerns from the start of talkies up through the 50s - but it's not really fair to directly compare those two numbers. If you're going to count

"Allude to" doesn't mean "devote a significant portion to". Do you really think that's what Arundel was suggesting?