I guess for me what seems weird about the ESPN comment isn't that it's sexual. It's that it's so out of left field. It's like reading the business section of a newspaper that's poor quality but still several self-respecting steps from tabloid (like USA today) and suddenly there's a joke about how company X really got…

are you trolling or what?

haha, +1 on this.

that wouldn't be a bad thing for me. rowr.

This was great: "Interesting, because my plans are to eat and fuck my way to Friday. If you need me, I'll be knee-deep in a giant banana cream pie. Make of that what you will." still laughing.

definitely a more-than-satisfactory response and much farther than a lot of bloggers go - most people just dig in their heels and would prefer to alienate a portion of their audience rather than ever apologize. Some commenters on here don't seem to understand the offense.

ah, cool, thank you for clarifying.

Point fairly taken, and with extra respect for being internally consistent re: clear communication.

yeah, so it should stay at Vice; not here.

how do you know he wasn't talking about Gawker media, the company?

while it may be snarky, sarcastic, funny, and related to sex, it's not really good at the "advice" part if you think of "advice" as useful suggestions that come from a good understanding of the topic.

please oh please jezebel, replace sciortino with this commenter. Between last time I read her, with her really weird shaming shaving advice, and this one where she obviously assumed that her experience of P-V sex was a good-enough gauge of everyone elses' as well, the column's just been embarrassingly bad. I think the…

yeah, I dunno, I feel you on this. Sometimes it feels like family guy was using "look at how weird or stereotypical this poor/female/minority/disabled character is" as an ironic commentary on how ignorant middle class white guys can be, but the more they jam that button, the less fitting the "ironic" descriptor…

I'd actually argue that the nook simple touch is tied for best eReader on the market right now: it's affordable, no ads, eInk Pearl, supports ePub, and slightly beats out Sony's offering because it flashes only once every few pages, making for a good compromise between ghosting and comfortable page turning. Sony can…

eh, either you're just spouting buzzwords, or you half-slept through gender studies 101.

yeah, but you have to admit there's an element of this article which is like "haw haw asian mythology is like 10x more ridiculous than our unicorn mythology, which actually makes SENSE. look at this, everything in asia is so weird and crazy, even their mythology is nuts!"

yeah, spacerac, I don't know, I'm gonna trust crindy on what her actual life experience was here, and what this particular guy's gist was at the particular time he said something like that. Or at least, I don't see a point of putting her claim of "once I dated an asshole Nice Guy" on trial.

I don't think the post was about finding someone to "blame" for the girl not liking him. I think it was about highlighting how friendship (for many people of any and all gender identities) can be considered a healthy and appropriate precursor to a relationship. The rest of this comment isn't really about your comment…

and right there is the difference between a website that just is trying to get viewing eyeballs and a website where equality and respect for women is a higher priority. It's pretty rare I visit jezebel, due to a pretty evident lack of critical thought that goes into selecting writers, topics, and approaches to topics.…