This is not relevant to the feminist parts (which I agree, hold up), but it still LOOKS good, too, which is remarkable given how poorly then-groundbreaking digital effects have aged in other cases.
This is not relevant to the feminist parts (which I agree, hold up), but it still LOOKS good, too, which is remarkable given how poorly then-groundbreaking digital effects have aged in other cases.
Jurassic Park holds up extremely well, honestly. The female lead is wearing sensible clothes given her profession and no one stops her from doing her job because she’s a woman. The young girl is the hacker and Goldblum is the shirtless eye candy. All the dinosaurs are female!
To clarify: in the United Kingdom, “commoners” are everyone who do not hold titles in their own right, excepting, I think, members of the Royal Family. All people who do not have a noble title in their own right and are not members of the Royal Family are therefore “commoners,” regardless of their personal wealth or…
I’m pretty sure commoner means non-royal. Diana’s family is part of the peerage and she descended from Charles II through one of his illegitimate children.
To be fair, I think the train stretched back to Wales in a nod to her husband’s title.
As someone from the area, I’d like to whisper that it’s named after its founder, John Lynch, who freed his own slaves and believed in the antislavery movement
I tune in for The Golden Girls reruns, and all I can say is, the original content they advertise for seems like the whitest shit that has ever been made.
Today I saw someone say the man who argued the innocence of the slaves who killed their captors on the Amistad to the Supreme Court of the United States by saying “I will not undertake to qualify it in words—this offer to send back the fugitive slaves of the South as an equivalent, provided the President will consent…
He was kind of a badass. In death as in life, I guess.
Yeah...I got a BFA from Tisch and SHOCKINGLY was able to get into a great law school and pass the bar on the first go around. Creative studies lead to creative minds, which is essential in law school and practice.
I also want to recommend Speechless to people - it does a great job dealing with the world of a disabled person and a family of a disabled person. And it’s one of the few shows on air that deals with poverty. (The family is financially struggling always.)
Kimmy Schmidt should just submit this YouTube clip and then say (Mona-Lisa Saperstein voice) “awards please!”
Great show but I took a hard pass after Chris Brown’s guest appearance. Unnecessary and offensive. HUNDREDS of actors could have played that role.
I do not get the point of being mean to people! You being grumpy isn’t going to solve the problem, so just take your lumps and realize the problem is beyond anyone’s control and just be resigned and nice. They’re doing their job.
I’m gonna have to disagree, because Speechless and The Goldbergs exist. Those shows are great.
Everyone’s said it: Charles was an adult, fully aware that he was in love with someone else. Diana was a teenager who may have been legitimately infatuated with something other than being a princess.
I never really understand why Charles was cast as the vilian in this marriage. Charles cheated on Diana. Diana cheated on Charles. They were two people that had no business being married to each other. Both probably played a role in the demise of their marriage.