I think it's somewhere between 16-19. Sure there are many factors, but having worked with kids from all walks of life poor and rich the fucked up ones usually were like that because of something their parents did wrong and it's really easy to mess with kids the balance is really hard to find and I don't think I did…

So you are saying that it's just pure luck that some kids don't share their nudes online with strangers and are not looking for a job in the escort industry, and that it has nothing to do with parents developing bonds with their children and nurturing their critical thinking abilities and their self-respect?

I probably did not make my point clear enough in the first place.

Since when does your average teen send nudes to strangers in hopes of getting an escort job?

This one.

Yes they have, I think that is quite obvious, but that does not change the fact that if your underage child is selling him or herself online you have also failed as a parent.

I have three the youngest is 23.

Sorry for not writhing a response longer than the article I am responding to.

Sure self respect does not prevent people of any age from doing anything for a little bit of money or attention.

Sure the skeezy adults are the ones committing a crime, but it's the parents who are making it a really easy crime to commit.

There are bad decisions and than there is sending nude pics to strangers on the internet to arrange a meeting with said stranger. The best that can happen in this scenario is sexual assault and the worst is death and anyone with even a little bit of sense can see that if a kid can not see that or goes through with it…

Parents of current teens take note if your kid does this it is on you and you have fucking failed.

We elected our parliament this weekend, you know what the number one hot topic was?

Well that was the point I was trying to make in my first sentence, the word female can be insulting but it's usually in situations where the person using the word would not call men males in the same situation.

Indeed he did, but as I pointed out in other places he called men males while still calling his brothers brothers.

Quite interesting having worker with a lot of English civil engineers it seemed to me as if they had an aversion to the word woman, to the point where even in the news you would hardly ever anyone described simply as a woman.

I was under the assumption that he was using male and female to describe guests in an attempt to make his article sound more sciency, and less as a stupid opinion peace. Not in an attempt to dehumanize women, the rest of the article does that just fine.

You do have a point.

As a non native speaker I was under the impression that male is both a noun and adjective.

I only see a problem with calling women females when men are called men, but over the course of the text he refers to men as males also.