ibelieveincoyotes
Ibelieveincoyotes
ibelieveincoyotes

Hes only “invulnerable” as it stands now because with him in office the GOP control the executive branch, the house, and the senate. They know that as long as he is there there is a reasonable chance that he will sign whatever garbage legislation they try to ramrod down our throats. They are letting him sit because it

I expected this, saw it coming, and this will break the back of illegal immigration more than anything tried before. It wont be hard at all, people in the surrounding community know when a place hires lots of illegal immigrants.

Bird law of attraction in this country is not governed by reason.

What was illegal and unjust about going to war in Afghanistan?

So the news have focused on Hollywood’s sexual predators and this White House endorsed non-controversy:

We declared war? For the first time in 67 years? Or are we just writing an indefinite blank check to defense contractors and bankrupting ourselves with supplemental Pentagon appropriations?

We started a war in another country to “fight terrorism”. The nation of Afghanistan did not declare or provoke war with the US. The US invasion of Afghanistan can be justified, but it can also be argued to have been illegal.

How was it just? The gov’t in Afghanistan didn’t attack us. A terrorist did. We had no right to go in and rampage across that country to chase down one guy who wound up not even being there! And lets not forget where most of the 9/11 hijackers were from - Saudi Arabia (mostly). None of them were from Afghanistan. It

We’ve raised this topic before (see here)—where we noted the dubious 2010 claim, published by the New York Times, that “the vast scale of Afghanistan’s mineral wealth was [recently] discovered by a small team of Pentagon officials and American geologists.” Other evidence, and logic, point to the fact that everyone but

You know, it’s funny conservatives are being like see! liberal hypocrisy!

Blackwater (now Academi)

The most troubling part about what Kimmel has said in recent years regarding healthcare and gun violence should not be controversial. However it is.

Why is, “Parents shouldn’t have to decide whether their kid lives or dies based on whether they can afford healthcare” a controversial statement? He making a purely moral

I know we’re mostly talking about Woody Allen here, but I really still don’t get how anyone can rationalize working with Polanski, a confessed and convicted child rapist.

and fuck meryl streep. she’s made like 10+ pictures with Weinstein. not only did she know, she warned her daughters (Grace Gummer of Mr. Robot and Mami Gummer of that show nobody watched on CW) a decade ago. Can you imagine being like, my flesh and blood is protected, but I don’t give a shit about those other victims?

“No one ever came to me or told me horror stories with any real seriousness,” he said.

Alternative headline: “Sexual Predator of Children Gives Bad Take on Sexual Predator of Women”

He doesn’t want this turned into a witch hunt because he’s worried he’ll be next in line. Unfortunately I don’t think that he has anything to worry about...cognitive dissonance and Hollywood go hand in hand . It’s all sickening. 

1. Woody Allen is an absolute pig fuck, as is Harvey Weinstein.

“And they wouldn’t, because you are not interested in it. You are interested in making your movie.”

Obama reduced the number of uninsured people to 30 million. It was higher before the ACA. And now Trump’s executive order will make that number higher again.