ianbruce02
Ian Bruce
ianbruce02

Hahahahahahahahahahahah....!! Good one.

So it's on a BIG lifesize lunar surface in Russia? Is it on a giant crane too? The sky is painted white. Is it supposed to be "day" on the moon?... or did they just run out of money? Who took the photograph? Was he standing on the moon too? It's a fake. You need to do your research.

The Russian reflector looks staged. So it's a fake, right?

Apollo 12 actually brought back some components of the Surveyor 3 probe which landed in 1967. This nimrod will just claim it was "faked" again. Apparently, no one and nothing has ever gone there — assuming that the moon is even real. It could be on rails, giant cranes, or projected by secret lasers from NASA.

Seeing a 4 meter object (like a descent module) at a range of 400,000 kilometers requires a resolving power of .002 arc-seconds. There is nothing on earth with that kind of power. Even the Hubble couldn't spot something the size of the Astrodome on the moon. Stop being a dumbass.

Of course they are... you can tell because of "the pixels". The retroreflectors are Photoshopped too, that's why observatories worldwide have been using them for the past 44 years.

Obviously. Russia was just created to give NASA competition. The whole country is shot on a Hollywood backlot with buildings on rails and giant cranes to make the people walk like they're experiencing earth-like gravity. I've never been there, so it must be true.

The Russian tracking was done using a 32 meter TNA-400 antenna located in Crimea, near Simferopol. They tracked all the Apollo missions, and it's documented by the Russian Space Agency itself. Next you'll be telling us the new LRO images of the landing sites are fakes, because "NASA" I guess.

OIC... you mean other SPACE agencies. Ask the Russians. They tracked all the Apollo missions from beginning to end using radar, optical telescopes, and radio intercepts. You can calculate orbits from those, BTW. If they ever doubted the landings, the photos, or the samples for a second, they would've screamed bloody

Riiiiiight... The New York Times had its own rocket to land ahead of time to catch Armstrong and Aldrin stepping off the LEM, but forgot where they left the keys.

I had simple goals in mind when I bought the car: I wanted a convertible sportscar, with a stick, that got at least 30 highway miles. That narrowed it down to 4 choices, and I test drove every one. The MR2 was my last test, and I made up my mind as soon as I made the first right turn out of the parking lot. The damn

I had to sell it. I'm splitting most of my time between China and Europe now. Once I settle back in somewhere, I'll build my own Caterham.

Yes... there were basically 2 options for the vehicle: paddle-shifters, and a limited slip differential. I went with the LSD, but naturally kept the stick. On my own, I added the proper MR eagle badging, leather upholstery, a dual exhaust from Team Moon (which I installed myself), a better 2 DIN sound system, luggage

Mid-engine, under 2,000 lbs, no automatic option, no gadgets, incredible handling, no trunk... I loved my silver 2004 dearly. (sniff)

Monty Python warned us of the rise of giant electric penguins with green stinging tentacles. This is merely the "Asimo" version. The next wave will be 20 feet tall.

It's not magic... it's just penguins in body armor.

Looks like they just tacked raw sheetmetal onto the chassis. I coulda done this in shop class.

It's a baconspiracy...

Salt, sugar, smoke flavor, sodium phosphate, sodium erythorbate, sodium nitrite... Most humans don't know what they're eating either.

Say what you want, but it still looks better than a Coda...