Because controversy follows. You don’t know this yet? Her image has still been ruined thanks to people like you that have drawn your own conclusions based off of your assumptions of what happened (and I quote: Sorry not sorry, but this Nicole Eramo sounds like a real bitch.)
Perhaps Jackie should have thought twice…
hypemachinegroupienot
hypemachinegroupienot
Durrrrr it’s just my OPINION, is what idiots say when they’ve been cornered and can’t come up with anything else to deflect.
Well you’re clearly a fucking idiot so who really cares what you think about much of anything.
Sorry about whatever weird hysterical mental illness you suffer from.
A real bitch? Why? Because she had the nerve to sue RS for seriously hurting her personal and professional reputation? Please. You clearly know nothing about Dean Eramo or about this case. And the words you put in her mouth aren’t even the way she was portrayed in the RS article, FFS. Which I read, by the way.
Yeah sorry but this isn’t a legitimate opinion.
Umm...ok. But the story is false. It has been established pretty concretely that Jackie made the whole thing up, and ruined a lot of reputations in the process. She also made it a lot harder for true rape victims to be believed. I find it fascinating that people are turning their anger towards the real victims here -…
So you’d be perfectly fine with your name being smeared, your career ruined, your potential career ruined, because someone lied to have a story written? You wouldn’t be the least bit upset? “You know, actually, it’s okay because maybe at one point something MAY have happened to you.”
You really should read up on the facts about this case. When Jackie first claimed/reported to Eramo that she was assaulted, Eramo did everything basically by the book in order to try and help her. It was Jackie who chose not to take any action. Jackie then later told (a different version) of her story to a reporter of…
What are you basing that on? The article that was proved to be lies or her anger at being lied about?
Seriously, you started by saying I’d posted four articles which all boil down to a posthumous remark by Diane Blair, which was totally untrue, unsupportable nonsense on your part. I point this out and you follow up by saying the equivalent of “Well, yeah, okay, but all these people accusing Clinton of rape are…
We can play this game all day, but what’s clear is that you seem to have a dog in this race. I wonder what it is. Clinton supporter, or just a garden variety misogynist? Several women have claimed to have been sexually abused by Bill Clinton. Why do you wish to trivialize and undermine the validity of their…
That’s cute, but the thing is: it isn’t telling you that. That Bill Clinton was accused of rape, on the other hand, is public knowledge and a matter of record. If you want to pretend that’s not the case, or diminish the role Hillary played in trashing his accusers, because you’re a supporter of hers, go for it, but I…
I shouldn’t have to provide sources in a comments section for commonly known facts about a major political candidate, but since you seem intent on being obstinate in defense of someone who perpetuates the abuse of women by her husband, here you go. It took me all of five seconds to find numerous reports on the matter.…
It’s called google. Use it. This stuff is common knowledge.
What’s relevant is that she has trashed the reputations of the women who have accused Bill of raping them while pretending to be a supporter of abuse victims. It matters.
Dunno. I voted for Obama and sometimes I wonder wtf he's doing so many snl tv show type of appearances.
You lost your faith in humanity because of this? What about things like the Holocaust?