hunterlholder-old
hunterlholder
hunterlholder-old

@toejam316: Crysis Warhead, Shivering Isles, and S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call of Pripyat did all of that, too. But did they cost $60? No. They all cost $30.

@toejam316: The price is the only thing I have against it. It should be $40 or less. $60 is really pushing it for an expansion pack. It would've been a first day buy if it would've been fairly priced. But sadly, it is not.

Sounds like an excellent game. Now, how about that PC version?

@Polterg3ist won't be pleased: I'm not too sure they'll go over well with shipping companies. How about all of the Halos packaged into one case?

@MrRevell: I tried out Red Faction: Guerilla on PC. It was just okay for PC. But they did not have PC in mind when creating the game. They had console in mind, which saddens me. I was on the verge of getting an Xbox 360 controller for Windows, but instead just demanded a refund on the game. So, I'd suggest to sell it

@Delano_J: I keep forgetting about that. VALVe mentioned that, also, with their DLC that was free on PC but not free on Xbox 360. Crash Course. That's it. Thank you for reminding me.

@Revenge_of_Nekojin: Just read over your posts. Does that give a positive impression of you? No. You definitely don't seem reasonable, and you definitely do fly off the handle defending companies trying to make a quick, easy buck. I'm not going to obsess over you and look through all of your posts. You can feel free

"I felt ODST was more of niche game, it was a little bit of an experiment," Jarrard said.

@Revenge_of_Nekojin: Your childish rage reminds me of GameFAQs. How did you even get allowed to post on Kotaku in the first place?

@GGear0323: What I'm saying is that not as many used copies will be sold(and thus more new copies will be sold) if less people are trading in their copies. And why would the people who trade in the games be mad? They get to experience the full game, then sell it back. The person who buys that copy of the game is the

@Neil Buchanan: "(not "realistic", as many games seem to be these days)"

"Go To Hell"

@YuniYoshi: You can still play the game with no internet connection, and it saves everything exactly the way it was. Even the ragdolls are in the exact same position. Better yet, it doesn't slow the game down at all while saving. It's possibly one of the best save systems ever.

@doubtful: All of the people I talk to hate all of this "buy new or suffer" crap, because they buy used. Don't they suffer enough by not having the game in puuuuuuurfect condition when they buy it?

This is something the majority of us gamers feared. Thinking on the bright side, at least we have access to the least desirable part of the game, right? Seriously, SOCOM is all about team work and communication. It's a terribly watered down experience in single player.

@GhostAmongMen: You're correct on that. If only a WM7 phone can do certain things that other phones can't do, then it's definitely the right thing to make those features exclusive to the phone. And the article saying every phone getting all of the same features is not a good idea. There's got to be a reason to get

@medicmechanic: Actually, I never got the game. I was going to get it for PC(don't have an Xbox 360), but I saw that the Cerberus network was just so frustrating that it wasn't worth it, and decided against getting the game until they fixed it. I'm not going to support the developers if they don't come through with

It's too dark to allow me to fully enjoy the graphical detail. :(

@Seepgood: No. It's legal. Otherwise, Ebay and Amazon would be in some deep trouble for allowing it. [www.amazon.com]

@Nevest356: You don't seem to know the definition of bait and switch. It's your own choice between inferior and superior, it's just that the superior one has superior features. The inferior one is just there to make you think the superior one is just that much better. It's just like the Xbox 360 Arcade and the Xbox