The driver of the van:
after dude jumps into his windshield: HOLY FUCK..
after he’s tackled off the roof: Do i just uhh.. stay here.. or .. pull over or .. what?

Are you upset that the only difference in power between a AMG GT and AMG GTS is a software tune by Mercedes too?

So are you also upset that your ISP doesn’t give you 300mb/s for the same price as the 30mb/s pack simply because they have the ability to unlock that speed by flipping a switch?

No, it’s not. Because in both cases, you’d know up front that the range is limited, or that only six cylinders are working. You can pay to upgrade. Or refuse the deal, and just not buy the car.

“and after I sign on the dotted line”
Nope.

Maybe it will get buried in the comments.

That would be to die for!

I think the problem is all the vertical elements combined with the squinty head and tails. It’s like the designers were in angst trying to fill up space below the lights, went to photoshop, box select the lower half and stretched it down 40%.

Yeah, but when are they going to make the coupe version of this? And then the four-door version of the coupe of the four-door?

there’s no place for the driveline.

All of the redneck stars for you today good sir.

I kinda want to see someone swap an LS into a salvage tesla...

On the one hand, I’ve watched many of his videos and he seems like the earnest, straight forward type. He doesn’t seem like the type to pull a cheap hoax for views.

Comments on YT are quick to point out different paint colors of the cars too. I have a feeling that is what could have happened instead of what actually happened - but he is milking it with a “to be continued” video.

Cops = “perps” in this scenario. 126 videos, but the only one anyone wants to see wasn’t turned on.

It’s just so convenient that the camera was “off” and no one knows why. Such BS. They know why the damn thing was off and that’s so they are not held accountable. Hold that officer guilty until proven innocent just like they assumed Bennett was

It’s tricky to claim he fit the description of the shooter if there was no shooter.

Did someone call in and say “a giant black man fired a gun”? In that case, he would fit a description. If not, and he was tackled because he was a giant black man running from a dangerous scene, then he fits something else, and we have a problem.

Fit the description of what? The police didn’t even know what happened.

I’m cool with any cop with their body camera turned off for no reason being guilty until proven innocent. If they can turn them off and have zero repercussions when doing so then what’s the point of them?