+1 for name and comment combo.

Why not both?

Oh I agree whole heartedly. I think if anyone should be sued, it would be he individual. That being said, I can see more of a justification, at least in the minds of the plaintiffs, that by employing him, there is at least some culpability.

I totally get that rationale (well, I do and I don’t..), but my thing is, the make of the car is sort of irrelevant.

I get the financial logic, certainly. I guess more accurately, I will be curious to see how they make the case that Toyota carries responsibility. And who knows? Maybe Toyota knew this guy was a creep, and had some history. I obviously don’t know all the facts.

Criminal charges seem totally appropriate, as does suing the dealership.

The EASY answer is to remove the badges. The RIGHT answer is to stick a hemi in it.

If she only had liability insurance, than this wouldn’t be covered.

Job opening!

Well I know which vehicle I will purchase once my kids get to dating age..

“Safety cat.”

Fuck. Yeah, I would have surely been fired, and probably charged with some sort of crime if I were still in charge of a kitchen. You used to be able to throw sauté pans. Now it’s “assault”.

It’s not all it’s cracked up to be.. I cooked for a living for a long time, and I am quite practiced in yelling at people.

>sounds electric

It is a scientific fact, that if you ignore fire, it will go away. The key is to not look directly at it, and to back away slowly as to not startle it.

But do you really want them seperated?

The Suicide Machines actually was a band back in the 90's and earlier 2000's. But a ska band... anyone who spent anywhere near as much time playing the first Tony Hawk game for PlayStation, should recognize it..

EXACTLY! I am doubly happy that Torch picked this exact ad.

🎈Much balloons! 🎈

Everybody is a winner today.